[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LIE DETECTION / VOCAL STRESS

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: LIE DETECTION / VOCAL STRESS
From: Brian Gygi <bgygi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:21:22 +0200
Delivery-date: Fri Oct 21 06:25:46 2005
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0510211158060.6828@orsi.inf.u-szeged.hu>
References: <BAY102-F388CE2ED31E798BFD5A522C8730@phx.gbl> <4358B5EE.3020308@ucl.ac.uk> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0510211158060.6828@orsi.inf.u-szeged.hu>
Reply-to: Brian Gygi <bgygi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

I was hoping the political dimensions of this would remain unstated, but alas it proved to be too juicy a target. Since it has, it might be noted that several top US officials are likely to be among the people who are reassured that automatic methods are still not very effective.

References:
- LIE DETECTION / VOCAL STRESS
  - From: Michael Fulton
- Re: LIE DETECTION / VOCAL STRESS
  - From: Mark Huckvale
- Re: LIE DETECTION / VOCAL STRESS
  - From: Toth Laszlo

Prev by Date: Re: LIE DETECTION / VOCAL STRESS
Next by Date: NYU Position Announcement
Previous by thread: Re: LIE DETECTION / VOCAL STRESS
Next by thread: Re: LIE DETECTION / VOCAL STRESS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread