[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Has anyone come across P300 for multiple targets?

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Has anyone come across P300 for multiple targets?
From: Nisha KV <nishakv1989@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:02:58 +0530
Approved-by: nishakv1989@xxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue Sep 1 00:15:32 2015
List-archive: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>
List-help: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MCGILL.CA?body=INFO AUDITORY>
List-owner: <mailto:AUDITORY-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-subscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-subscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
Reply-to: Nisha KV <nishakv1989@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I m aware of the P300 with the three stimulus odd ball paradigm..Ample of literature evidence on standard, one target and a distractor (as in p3a, p3b paradigm) is available.... But my doubt is can one elicit P300 for multiple targets (say 3 targets and one standard) ...

Nisha. K. V
Junior Research Fellow
Department of Audiology
All India Institute of Speech and Hearing
Mysore.

Prev by Date: Call for articles: Opticon1826, Auditory Science special edition
Next by Date: Paper request: "Visual capture in auditory distance perception: Proximity image effect reconsidered" by Mershon et al
Previous by thread: Call for articles: Opticon1826, Auditory Science special edition
Next by thread: Re: Has anyone come across P300 for multiple targets?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread