Re: About importance of "phase" in sound recognition

[James Johnston <James.Johnston@xxxxxxx>]

Whoa. I just drifted off there.

500Hz at 1, .25 at 500-4 and 500+4

Or you can use 1khz and then use 1000+4 and 1000-4.

I believe I suffered a change of center frequency between the first and second parts of my post. Sorry.

__________________________
James D. Johnston  (jj@xxxxxxx)
CHIEF SCIENTIST - DTS, Inc.

425-814-3200, ext. 134 - office
425-814-3204 - fax
206-321-7449- mobile

11410 NE 122nd Way,  Suite 100
Kirkland, WA 98034

This electronic transmission (and/or the documents accompanying it) may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use, copying or distribution is prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify DTS, Inc immediately by telephone (425-814-3200) and destroy the original message. Messages sent to and from us may be monitored.


-----Original Message-----
From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception [mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joachim Thiemann
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:35 AM
To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AUDITORY] About importance of "phase" in sound recognition

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 09:33, emad burke <emad.burke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> By the way, I apologize for not providing the reference for the mathematical
> article that I referred to in the previous email. here is a link to it :
>
> http://www.math.missouri.edu/~pete/pdf/132-painless.pdf
>

Hello Emad, from my quick reading of this paper (since the topic is
quite interesting to me) I notice the following (others feel free to
correct me if I get this wrong):
- to reconstruct a N-dimensional (complex) vector from magnitude only
coefficients you need N^2 coefficients (N(N+1)/2 for real vectors).
An earlier paper (in SPIE 2007) talks about sparse representations
needing as little as 2N-1 coefficients (in the real case). I am not
certain yet if they have generalized it to the complex case, and it
this only applies to a specific set of frames.
- reconstruction from magnitude only will always be within a root of
unity (that is, the solution will be a set of vectors that differ from
each other by e^{-i\phi} \phi=0...2\pi as one expects.

Thanks for the link though!  I am still working in reconstruction from
the basis of Griffin&Lim's iterative reconstruction algorithm, so this
is quite interesting to me.

Joe.
-- 
Joachim Thiemann :: http://www.tsp.ece.mcgill.ca/~jthiem

Notice:
This message and any included attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee, and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please destroy the original message and any copies or printouts hereof.