[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

comparing cochlear models ?

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: comparing cochlear models ?
From: emad burke <emad.burke@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:04:17 +0200
Approved-by: emad.burke@xxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed May 19 09:53:15 2010
List-archive: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>
List-help: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MCGILL.CA?body=INFO AUDITORY>
List-owner: <mailto:AUDITORY-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-subscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-subscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
Reply-to: emad burke <emad.burke@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Dear list

I am trying to find a metric which i can compare different cochlear models based on. in other words i need a "quantitative" metric which there is a consensus on in the whole community and its widely accepted. Of course i dont mean a metric like "how biologically plausible a cochlear model is" since i dont think it is quantifiable. as a simple example if you were going to compare the traditional Dick Lyons old cochlear model with the one that i'm developing myself how am i supposed to compare them and conclude which ones superior ?

Best Regards
Emad

Prev by Date: Re: GPL realtime auditory modelling
Next by Date: Re: comparing cochlear models ?
Previous by thread: ASCII / html and Digest
Next by thread: Re: comparing cochlear models ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread