[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RTA question

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RTA question
From: Pawel Kusmierek <p.kusmierek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:05:51 +0200
Delivery-date: Thu Aug 5 03:37:36 2004
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <opsb8wzxemc0cqda@samferguson-g5.arch.usyd.edu.au>
References: <410FE80A.9060005@redhook.com> <4522.83.144.74.83.1091563340.squirrel@83.144.74.83> <opsb8wzxemc0cqda@samferguson-g5.arch.usyd.edu.au>
Reply-to: Pawel Kusmierek <p.kusmierek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a

I have just recalled that free Audacity http://audacity.sourceforge.net
offers both FFT and cross-correlation-based analysis. Might be helpful.

Sam Ferguson said:
> Audition is good, and the spectrogram and analysis tools are impressive.
It seems best set up for two-track stuff though.
> i find editing painful in
> audition,

Just of curiosity -  why do you find multitrack editing in Audition not
comfortable?

Another Audition feature which might be useful for Topher Farell is
Frequency Space Editing - one may select an area (limited both in time nad
frequency domains) in spectrogram and apply processing (including
silencing) to this area only.

Pawel

--
Pawel Kusmierek
Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology
ul. Pasteura 3
02-093 Warsaw, Poland
phone: (+48 22) 58 92 388
fax: (+48 22) 822 53 42
email: p.kusmierek@nencki.gov.pl

References:
- RTA question
  - From: Topher Farrell
- Re: RTA question
  - From: Pawel Kusmierek
- Re: RTA question
  - From: Sam Ferguson

Prev by Date: Re: RTA question
Next by Date: Job Posting
Previous by thread: Re: RTA question
Next by thread: Re: RTA question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread