[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

"sound field" - continued

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: "sound field" - continued
From: Peter Lennox <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 22:33:11 -0000
Comments: To: soundscapemail <soundscapeuk@mailbase.ac.uk>, sursound@darkwing.uoregon.edu
Reply-to: Peter Lennox <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I've received (and am receiving) some interesting and diverse responses to
my request for opinions on the definition of "sound fields" as against
"sound environments".
Thanks to all.
I wonder if those who have responded might allow me to release all the
responses in one mail, as I feel that the various perspectives do complement
each other, even when apparently contradictory?
I'll wait for your permission,
thanks again
Peter Lennox
Hardwick House
tel: (0114) 2661509
e-mail: peter@lennox01.freeserve.co.uk
or:- ppl100@york.ac.uk

Prev by Date: ICAD2001 - Call for Papers
Next by Date: Re: missing fundamental references
Previous by thread: ICAD2001 - Call for Papers
Next by thread: Sound field
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread