[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: High frequency sensitivity

To: Multiple recipients of list AUDITORY <AUDITORY%MCGILL1.BITNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: High frequency sensitivity
From: Kevin Baker <klb@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 1995 09:38:44 +0100
In-reply-to: <199503290623.HAA23817@macondo.dmu.ac.uk>
Reply-to: Kevin Baker <klb@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Research in auditory perception <AUDITORY%MCGILL1.BITNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Why is it well accepted that a sampling rate of 44.1 kHz is too low?

If a percentage of young listeners have hearing sensitivity above 22 kHz,
then that is a smaller percentage of the total human population.  Is that
a significant percentage?

Kevin L. Baker

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+   Tel 0116 2533 577761          Deptartment of Human Communication   +
+   Fax 0116 2533 577708          De Montfort University,              +
+                                 Scraptoft Campus, Leicester,         +
+   24Hrs 01623 721319            LE7 9SU,  United Kingdom.            +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Prev by Date: High frequency sensitivity
Next by Date: Re: High frequency sensitivity
Previous by thread: High frequency sensitivity
Next by thread: Re: High frequency sensitivity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread