Dear Raul, goede morgen Alejandro and Bill,
Thank you for sharing these insights.
Raul you shared a number of platforms that are new to me.
Alejandro, it helps a lot that you shared your strategy and the different goals that you chase per platform. I like the GitHub integration of Zenodo. I will
digest this to revise my publishing strategy and will share it later here if people are interested. Further suggestions are still welcome.
Bill shared some insights regarding the carbon footprint of chip design, re-use of medical devices and waste.
Meanwhile, our little article/blog appeared here. We got excellent support from the editors by the way from the Hearing Tracker and were glad we were able to publish it before the COP27 started.
Cheers, en bedankt!
Jan-Willem
Van: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> namens Raul Sanchez <000001b89f1f4a81-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Verzonden: zaterdag 5 november 2022 14:30 Aan: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Onderwerp: Re: [AUDITORY] preprints, community journals, and the carbon footprint of hearing healthcare
Hi Alejandro and Jan-Willem
I absolutely agree with the uses of each platforms. Very helpful insights indeed!
For pre-registration I would add https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ and a quite interesting platform named: https://aspredicted.org/ Also for data sharing, some journals allow to include data directly during the submission in platforms such as https://figshare.com/.
One important aspect about preprints that we did not touch upon is “when” you can submit a preprint and not jeopardize your peer-review publication. There are journals that only allow preprints before the submission to the journal (e.g. Alejandro could not upload a new version after acceptance in those). The best way to know about it is with the Sherpa/Romeo: https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ There, you can see whether you can use preprints, and whether you can post your accepted or copyedited version in your website or institutional repository.
Best wishes
Raul Sanchez-Lopez
From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Alejandro Osses
Hoi Jan-Willem,
These are very interesting questions. I just read Raúl's answers with his clarifications about these new ""publishing schemes", so my answer here is based on my own experience about some of the platforms you mentioned (this means that I am not answering directly to your questions).
You mentioned BioRxiv, ArXiv, OSF, and Zenodo. I happened to have used all these platforms and I actually use them for different purposes.
I have used these platforms without peer review, but the idea is for me, to always publish in a peer review journal soon after. My own papers have suffered big transformations during a couple of reviews. Therefore, I found it somehow a "risk" that my first preprint versions are circulating. My workaround is that, once a paper is published, I make a new final version of the preprint, so that people who will download my preprint in the future will not only see the link to the published paper (an automatic option from BioRxiv and ArXiv), but if the press "download" they will get the most recent preprint version of the paper.
Of course not every person sticks to these rules very strictly, so it can well be that you run into papers that never got through a peer review (and are not planning to). To this extent BioRxiv and ArXiv may not be the best for relying 100% on what is hosted there.
I hope the insights here are useful :)
Success... Groetjes, Alejandro
Op vr 4 nov. 2022 om 05:04 schreef Wasmann, Jan-Willem <Jan-Willem.Wasmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. De informatie in dit bericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Aan dit bericht en de bijlagen kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend. Heeft u deze e-mail onbedoeld ontvangen? Dan verzoeken
wij u het te vernietigen en de afzender te informeren. Openbaar maken, kopiëren en verspreiden van deze e-mail of informatie uit deze e-mail is alleen toegestaan met voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de afzender. Het Radboudumc staat geregistreerd
bij de Kamer van Koophandel in het handelsregister onder nummer 80262783. |