[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUDITORY] Tolerance time interval for piano performance recognition



David,

Your list of studies is quite interesting. May I add one you forgot to mention?
Divenyi, P. L. and Hirsh, I.J. (1978). Some figural properties of auditory patterns. T
he Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64(5), 1369-1385.

Cheers,
Pierre

On 3/29/19 3:15 AM, Huron, David wrote:

Federico,


Regarding timing synchronization in music performance, the work of Rudolph Rasch is especially pertinent.

If you're not already aware, the performance research from Sundberg and colleagues at KTH offers a wealth of information. Additional work listed below.


-David Huron


Bjurling, J. (2007). Timing in Piano Music: A Model of Melody Lead. Skolan för datavetenskap och kommunikation, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan.

Goebl, W. (2001). Melody lead in piano performance: Expressive device or artifact?. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(1), 563-572.

Hirsh, I. J. (1959). Auditory perception of temporal order. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31(6), 759–767.

Holmes, S. D., & Roberts, B. (2006). Inhibitory influences on asynchrony as a cue for auditory segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1231.

Llorens, A. (2017). Recorded asynchronies, structural dialogues: Brahms's Adagio Affettuoso, Op. 99ii, in the hands of Casals and Horszowski. Music Performance Research, 8.

McGookin, D. K., & Brewster, S. A. (2004). Understanding concurrent earcons: Applying auditory scene analysis principles to concurrent earcon recognition. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 1(2), 130-155.

Mellinger, D. K. (1991). Event formation and separation in musical sound (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University).

Rasch, R. A. (1978). The perception of simultaneous notes such as in polyphonic music. Acustica, 40, 21–33.

Rasch, R. A. (1979). Synchronization in performed ensemble music. Acustica, 43, 121–131.

Rasch, R. A. (1981). Aspects of the perception and performance of polyphonic music (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht, Netherlands: Elinkwijk BV.

Rasch, R. A. (1988). Timing and synchronization in ensemble performance. In J. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisa- tion, and composition (pp. 70–90). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Repp, B. H. (1996). The art of inaccuracy: Why pianists' errors are difficult to hear. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 161-183.

Saldanha, E. L., & Corso, J. F. (1964). Timbre cues and the identification of musical instruments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 2021–2026.

Sheft, S. (2008). Envelope processing and sound-source perception. In Auditory perception of sound sources (pp. 233-280). Springer, Boston, MA.





From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Federico Simonetta <federico.simonetta@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 7:37:03 AM
To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Tolerance time interval for piano performance recognition
 
Dear list,
I am a Ph.D. student in music informatics at the University of Milan. My project is about piano performance analysis and score-informed piano transcription.

I was wondering if someone here knows any study about one or more of the following time tolerance intervals. I am interested in the threshold after which a human can recognize that in piano performances: 

* two or more onsets are not synchronous
* two onsets are in different timing positions in respect to the previous identical note offset/onset
* two or more offsets are not synchronous
* two notes have different durations in monophonic/polyphonic environments

I have found the following related paper, but it is rather old:
E. F. Clarke, “The Perception of Expressive Timing in Music,” vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 2–9, Jun. 1989.

From this study, it seems that humans are able to recognize differences in music performances even if time changes lasts only 20 ms. However, most of the researches involving computational analysis of music performances (audio-to-score alignment and automatic music transcription), refer to the threshold of 50 ms as tolerance.

I am wondering if, as of today, some more recent and in-depth research has been carried on.

Thank you very much to anyone's help!

Cheers,
federico

---

Federico Simonetta, PhD student

LIM - Music Informatics Laboratory
Dept. of Computer Science
University of Milano
Via Celoria 18
I-20133 Milano - ITALY

Skype: federico_simonetta
http://www.lim.di.unimi.it
http://federicosimonetta.frama.io