[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUDITORY] Measuring perceptual similarity



Thanks for sharing the references!

 

In my view, MUSHRA cannot be recommended for studying musical similarity.

 

The method is designed to identify differences between stimuli on a defined dimension (which is audio quality in the MUSHRA recommendation, although this rating method could also be used for evaluating other perceptual dimensions).

 

In the MUSHRA method, listeners are NOT asked to rate the similarity of the stimuli, however. While in principle information about similarity could be deduced in an indirect manner from the ratings obtained with MUSHRA (similar mean ratings = high similarity), this would require that you can specify  the perceptual dimension on which your stimuli differ or are similar (say, rhythm, tempo, consonance/dissonance, mood etc.).

 

If that is not possible, the other approaches that were suggested like triadic tests or MDS can be used *without* having to specify which exact dimension  the similarity judgments should refer to, and to identify structures in the (dis-) similarity ratings.

 

In addition, I could imagine that the MUSHRA concepts of a high-quality “reference” and a low-quality “anchor” do not easily apply to the experiments you have in mind.

 

Best

 

Daniel

 

---------------------------------

Dr. Daniel Oberfeld-Twistel

Associate Professor

Johannes Gutenberg - Universitaet Mainz

Institute of Psychology

Experimental Psychology

Wallstrasse 3

55122 Mainz

Germany

 

Phone ++49 (0) 6131 39 39274

Fax   ++49 (0) 6131 39 39268

http://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/oberfeld/

https://www.facebook.com/WahrnehmungUndPsychophysikUniMainz

 

From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Pat Savage
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 6:19 AM
To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Measuring perceptual similarity

 

Dear list,

 

Thanks very much for all of your responses. I’m summarizing below all the reference recommendations I received. 

 

I still want to more fully read some of these, but so far my impression is that the Giordano et al. (2011) paper gives a good review of the benefits and drawbacks of previous methods, but since that was published MUSHRA seems to have become the standard method for these types of subjective perceptual similarity ratings.

 

Please let me know if I seem to be misunderstanding anything here.

 

Cheers,

Pat 

--

Flexer, A., & Grill, T. (2016). The Problem of Limited Inter-rater Agreement in Modelling Music Similarity. Journal of New Music Research45(3), 1–13.

 

P. Susini, S. McAdams, S. Winsberg: A multidimensional technique for sound quality assessment. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 85 (1999), 650–656.

 

Novello, A., McKinney, M. F., & Kohlrausch, A. (2006). Perceptual evaluation of music similarity. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval. Retrieved from http://ismir2006.ismir.net/PAPERS/ISMIR06148_Paper.pdf

Michaud, P. Y., Meunier, S., Herzog, P., Lavandier, M., & D’Aubigny, G. D. (2013). Perceptual evaluation of dissimilarity between auditory stimuli: An alternative to the paired comparison. Acta Acustica United with Acustica99(5), 806–815.

 

Wolff, D., & Weyde, T. (2011). Adapting Metrics for Music Similarity Using Comparative Ratings. 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR’11), Proc., (Ismir), 73–78. 

 

B. L. Giordano, C. Guastavino, E. Murphy, M. Ogg, B. K. Smith, S. McAdams: Comparison of methods for collecting and modeling dissimilarity data: Applications to complex sound stimuli. Multivariate Behavioral Research 46 (2011), 779–811.

 

P. Y. Michaud, S. Meunier, P. Herzog, M. Lavandier, G. d’Aubigny: Perceptual evaluation of dissimilarity between auditory stimuli: an alternative to the paired  comparison. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 99 (2013), 806–815.

 

Collett, E., Marx, M., Gaillard, P., Roby, B., Fraysse, B., & Deguine, O. (2016). Categorization of common sounds by cochlear implanted and normal hearing adults. Hearing Research335, 207–219.

 

International Telecommunication Union. (2015). ITU-R BS.1534-3, Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of audio systems. ITU-R Recommendation15343, 1534–3. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/bs/R-REC-BS.1534-3-201510-I!!PDF-E.pdf

 

Lavandier, M., Meunier, S., & Herzog, P. (2008). Identification of some perceptual dimensions underlying loudspeaker dissimilarities. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America123(6), 4186–4198. 

 

DZHAFAROV, E. N., & OLDENBURG, H. C. (2006). RECONSTRUCTING DISTANCES AMONG OBJECTS FROM THEIR DISCRIMINABILITY. Psychometrika71(2), 365–386.

 

Software: 

 

Various:

 

MUSHRA:

 

Free-sorting:

---
Dr. Patrick Savage
Project Associate Professor

Faculty of Environment and Information Studies

Keio University SFC (Shonan Fujisawa Campus)
http://PatrickESavage.com