Re: slightly OT: raw audio file format

[Enrico Marchetto <marchet1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wavesurfer, from KTH, usually is able to guess correctly the raw data 
format; moreover, it has an intuitive interface for the "trial and 
error" procedure.

Enrico.

Il 01/06/2011 12:47, John Culling ha scritto:
> Trial and error. I should try 44.1 kHz 16-bit stereo first.
> CoolEdit/Audition is good at reinterpreting raw data
> however you say.
>
> John.
>
> > > > Massimo Grassi<massimo.grassi@xxxxxxxx>  01 June 2011 11:00:59>>>
> Dear list members,
>
> I've been asked by a friend to work on a recording. The recording file
> extension is "raw". I'm not familiar with this type of file. As far as I
> understood this file-type is an uncompressed audio file with no header
> information.
>
> Here come the questions:
> 1. Are the above information correct?
> 2. Is there any other info missing?
> 3. How do I understand sample rate and bit resolution if the file has no
> header?
>
> Thank you all in advance,
> m