[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

f0 frequency difference limen

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: f0 frequency difference limen
From: Andrew Milne <andymilne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:24:39 +0000
Approved-by: andymilne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue Jan 13 05:26:54 2009
List-archive: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>
List-help: <http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MCGILL.CA?body=INFO AUDITORY>
List-owner: <mailto:AUDITORY-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-subscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-subscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:AUDITORY-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
Reply-to: andymilne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Pipex Webmail (IMP3.1)

Dear members of the list,

Is there a consensus on the size of the frequency difference limen for the f0 of complex tones such as those 
produced by musical instruments - i.e. containing both resolved and unresolved harmonics. References to papers 
describing the precise nature of the tests used would also be helpful.

Many thanks

Andrew Milne

-------------------------------------------------
Visit Pipex Business: The homepage for UK Small Businesses

Go to http://www.pipex.co.uk/business-services

Prev by Date: ISAAR 2009
Next by Date: Re: f0 frequency difference limen
Previous by thread: ISAAR 2009
Next by thread: Re: f0 frequency difference limen
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread