Re: Article request: Pavlovic, C. (1991)

["Beerends, J.G. (John)" <john.beerends@xxxxxx>]

Dear All,

Personally I would be in favor of allowing attachments and leave it up
to the members of the AUDITORY LIST to decide whether something is of
general interest and thus could be send as an  attachment to the
reflector.
I found the paper I got from Chaslav over the reflector very intersting
and this paper certainly falls in the category "high quality and of
general interest". And indeed with all these high speed connections and
large computer storage this should be no problem. Why not allow it and
see if we can self regulate?

John Beerends
TNO Information and Communication Technology
The  Netherlands


-----Original Message-----
From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception
[mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chas Pavlovic
Sent: dinsdag 6 januari 2009 23:16
To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Article request: Pavlovic, C. (1991)

Pierre, I will send you the article in a separate email since I was so
publicly reminded  that this list should not be used for attachments.  
If anybody else needs this or other SII (AI) articles let me know.  
Also, I will try to put some of those on www.sii.to in the next few
days. At this day and age with virtually unlimited storage, fast DSL,
and a the delete function on the keyboard it is hard to justify that
journal articles should not be enclosed.
Chas

Pierre Divenyi wrote:
> Dawna,
>
> Please do the electronic version, so that others on the list could 
> also benefit from Chas's 1991 wisdom (I am sure he will not mind).
>
> -Pierre
>
> At 02:53 PM 1/5/2009, Lewis, Dawna E wrote:
>> Oddly enough, I was cleaning some files recently and actually have a 
>> hard copy of that article. I could send you one via regular mail or 
>> try to get time to scan it over the next couple of days.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Dawna Lewis
>
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html