Dear list,
Hello, I am a new member. A colleague pointed out this list to me since I am a CI user as well as a research scientist
interested in CI psychoacoustics. I thouroughly enjoy listening to and
playing music. I play drums and keyboard. I lost my hearing suddenly to
meningitis at 12 and was implanted at 13. As a child, I did not have a good
sense of harmony, nor could I sing in tune, but I began playing drums around the
age of 11. I am now in an amateur band and listen to several hours of music
every day. Preferences tend towards rhythmic pieces such as Indian music (I also
play tablas) and bluegrass (love the finger-picking), but I my
interests vary.
The greatest deficit that I have noticed is that I don't feel a strong
percept associated with chords. I do experience a weak percept allowing me to
classify a strong harmonic diad such as tonic and fifth, or tonic and
octave, versus tonic and major 7th. But in a controlled study, I think I
would fail to classify majors versus minors.
A couple comments related to previous threads. First, I think I know a CI
user who can sing in tune. I've always felt that I was one of the stars of
the implant world, but this guy is phenomenal and is more of a professional
musician than me (i.e. he gets paid gigs). He is a keyboardist, but is trained
so well, that I wouldn't be surprised if he can match his voice.
Second, and this is huge. Please do not think that the CI simulations
currently used are accurate is transmitting the percept of sound. At best, they
are accurate indicators of the information content transmitted by a generic CI
sound processing strategy. The moment you use either a noise carrier or
sinusoids or even band-limited impulse trains, you are producing a percept that
is fundamentally different from what music sounds like to me. As a musician
dances upwards in a scale, the individual notes produce distinct electrode
amplitude patterns that in turn produce a percept (hopefully ptich matched). But
for a NH listening to a CI simulation, two adjacent bands being bombarded with
band-limited noise carriers is not going to produce the same percept at all. To
begin with, using noise carriers will introduce temporal fluctuations in the
envelope signal that is distinctly interpreted as noise. I could go on, but I
feel I am going to fast to make a cohesive statement, so will stop.
I hope these comments prove interesting since they are my introduction to
the list....
Ray
Sensimetrics Corporation
48 Grove St. Somerville, MA 02144 Tel: 617-625-0600 x240 Fax: 617-625-6612 email: raygold@xxxxxxxx web: www.sens.com |