[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Internal Auditory Integrity vs. Hypersonic NeuroMarketing Brain Implants : The Cognitive Liberty Foundation
- To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Internal Auditory Integrity vs. Hypersonic NeuroMarketing Brain Implants : The Cognitive Liberty Foundation
- From: leo sullivan <hilarleo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:07:59 -0700
- Comments: To: wessel@cnmat.berkeley.edu, ali@cnmat.berkeley.edu, Mason@Masonbates.com, loui psyche <psyche@socrates.berkeley.edu>
- Delivery-date: Fri May 21 19:45:35 2004
- Reply-to: leo sullivan <hilarleo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%
The Cognitive Liberty Foundation
A project of the intersection of a variety of neurological, therapeutic and creative disciplines
[ consolidating the explorations and of RU Sirius & Dr. Sasha Shulgin among many others ]
is currently incorporating the implications of
Hypersonic Sound
Internal Speech [ http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/issues/first_amend_index.html ]
NeuroMarketing [ http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/issues/neuromarketing.html , 3 recent articles ]
and Brain-Computer Interfacing [http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/issues/bci_index.htm ]
within their comprehensive
NeuroEthics & NeuroPolicy [ http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/proj_neuro.html ]
argument for a proposed
" Internal Auditory Integrity " [ http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/issues/first_amend_index.html ]
as a civil right.
Get ready.
$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%$%