[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: formant filtering

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: formant filtering
From: =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?T=F3th_L=E1szl=F3?= <tothl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:59:54 +0100
Comments: To: Eckard Blumschein <Eckard.Blumschein@E-TECHNIK.UNI-MAGDEBURG.DE>
Delivery-date: Thu Feb 27 05:02:05 2003
In-reply-to: <3.0.5.32.20030227084400.00bf3bb8@dfnserv1.urz.uni-magdeburg.de>
Reply-to: =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?T=F3th_L=E1szl=F3?= <tothl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Eckard Blumschein wrote:

> please don't take it amiss if I admit my guess: A narrower bandwidth at the
> level of auditory nerve would not improve but on the contrary degradate
> accuracy of hearing in general.

Then, psychoacoustic experiments that find that narrower formant bandwidth
improves intelligibility could help you revisit your theory.
I think this has already been shown many times, and our colleagues
(probably Mr. Sivaprasad himself?) could give us some references on
this.

               Laszlo Toth
        Hungarian Academy of Sciences         *
  Research Group on Artificial Intelligence   *   "Failure only begins
     e-mail: tothl@inf.u-szeged.hu            *    when you stop trying"
     http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/~tothl        *

Follow-Ups:
- Re: formant filtering
  - From: Ramdas Kumaresan

References:
- Re: formant filtering
  - From: Eckard Blumschein

Prev by Date: Re: formant filtering
Next by Date: Re: formant filtering
Previous by thread: Re: formant filtering
Next by thread: Re: formant filtering
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread