[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: On the Grammar of Music

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: On the Grammar of Music
From: Stephen McAdams <Stephen.McAdams@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:08:13 +0200
Organization: IRCAM-CNRS
References: <4.3.1.20010425173027.00b20600@vm1.mcgill.ca> <002801c0ce44$96c27c00$100b423e@oemcomputer> <064c01c0ce4d$6b5c7940$55f2fea9@uio.no> <002a01c0ce89$124495e0$450b423e@oemcomputer>
Reply-to: Stephen.McAdams@xxxxxxxx
Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> There are no such rules.

Since Ed Burns isn't on this list anymore, I guess someone else has to
huff and puff and blow the house down and say "Stop the patent
nonsense!"

Anyone who truly believes there are no rules in music would give up
working on the neuroscience of music and become a roofer. At least
there the basic rule is, water flows down hill (unless you don't believe
there are rules concerning gravity and water flow).

--
Stephen McAdams
Equipe Perception et Cognition Musicales
Ircam-CNRS (UMR 9912)
1 place Igor-Stravinsky
F-75004 Paris, France
tel: +33.1.4478.4838, fax +33.1.4478.1540
http://www.ircam.fr/pcm/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On the Grammar of Music
  - From: Pierre Divenyi
- Re: On the Grammar of Music
  - From: Tom Brennan
- Re: On the Grammar of Music
  - From: Michael Norris
- Re: On the Grammar of Music
  - From: Martin Braun

References:
- Re: On the Grammar of Music
  - From: Robert Zatorre
- Re: On the Grammar of Music
  - From: Martin Braun
- Re: On the Grammar of Music
  - From: O.T.Furnes
- Re: On the Grammar of Music
  - From: Martin Braun

Prev by Date: Re: On the Grammar of Music
Next by Date: Re: On the Grammar of Music
Previous by thread: Re: On the Grammar of Music
Next by thread: Re: On the Grammar of Music
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread