[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Operational Definition of Musician

To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Operational Definition of Musician
From: Piet Vos <vos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 09:38:46 +0200
Comments: To: Brian Gygi <bgygi@INDIANA.EDU>
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1000605111121.29915A-100000@kate.ucs.indiana.edu>
References: <002101bfceaf$3c759240$04000005@helmholtz>
Reply-to: Piet Vos <vos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: AUDITORY Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

A critical review of this awkward (methodological) issue is presented in a
forthcoming paper by Auhagen & Vos in a Special Issue of Music Perception
on Tonality Induction, summer 2000, "Experimental methods in tonality
induction research: A review".

Greeting,

Piet V.

Piet G. Vos
section Perception NICI, U. Nijmegen
P.O.Box 9104
6500 HE Nijmegen NL
tel: +31 24 36126 31/20; fax: +31 24 361 60 66; vos@nici.kun.nl
home-page: http://www.nici.kun.nl/~vos


"et altissimus humilissimum facere debet"

References:
- Operational Definition of Musician
  - From: William Cooper
- Re: Operational Definition of Musician
  - From: Brian Gygi

Prev by Date: Re: Operational Definition of Musician
Next by Date: Re: AUDITORY Digest - 4 Jun 2000 to 5 Jun 2000 (#2000-73)
Previous by thread: Re: Operational Definition of Musician
Next by thread: Re: Operational Definition of Musician
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread