Subject: Re: [AUDITORY] better listserv tech From: Dan Ellis <dan.ellis@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:45:10 -0400--000000000000a167a70632e72b56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Since my name was mentioned... A few years back I suggested moving the list to Google Groups. (At that time, McGill was having some problems with their listserv setup, but it seems fine now.) My interest in Google Groups was that it was modern and probably long-lasting, but many people were (I think) uncomfortable ceding control to a megacorp, so no action was taken. We have a very large and diverse membership, which inclines me to stick with what we have -- which is, implicitly, acceptable to most (although we have had dozens of departures in the past few weeks). I regret that the flexibility isn't as great as some would wish, but my feeling is it works pretty well. Thanks for the constructive discussion. DAn. --000000000000a167a70632e72b56 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Since my name was mentioned... =C2=A0<div><br></div><div>A= few years back I suggested moving the list to Google Groups. =C2=A0(At tha= t time, McGill was having some problems with their listserv setup, but it s= eems fine now.) =C2=A0My interest=C2=A0in Google Groups was that it was mod= ern and probably long-lasting, but many people were (I think) uncomfortable= ceding control to a megacorp, so no action was taken.</div><div><br></div>= <div>We have a very large and diverse membership, which inclines me to stic= k with what we have -- which is, implicitly, acceptable to most (although w= e have had dozens of departures in the past few weeks).=C2=A0 I regret that= the flexibility isn't as great as some would wish, but my feeling is i= t works pretty well.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the constructive d= iscussion.</div><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0 DAn.</div></div> --000000000000a167a70632e72b56--