Re: [AUDITORY] Efficient Brain Recording - Audio to EEG (bhiksha raj )


Subject: Re: [AUDITORY] Efficient Brain Recording - Audio to EEG
From:    bhiksha raj  <bhiksha@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Sat, 29 Jun 2024 10:10:33 +0530

--0000000000002bf4b4061bfff96b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would be interested in this too. I always assumed it was ABRs, since they use it to test newborns... best Bhiksha On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 9:32=E2=80=AFAM Malcolm Slaney < 000001757ffb5fe1-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is there a consensus about what is the most *efficient* way to establish > that there is an audio-brain-recording connection? By efficient I mean i= n > terms of the least amount of subject time. > > What I want to know is: how can I mostly quickly establish that we are > picking up EEG signals *due* to an audio signal? > > I suspect ABRs, since they are used in infant screening. FFRs seem > interesting because they are continuous. ERPs seem more problematic sinc= e > they often have a low repetition rate. (Acknowledging that strictly > speaking the ABR is a form of ERP.) > > Is there a written comparison? > > Thanks. > > - Malcolm > --=20 Bhiksha Raj Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, USA Tel: 412 268 9826 --0000000000002bf4b4061bfff96b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">I would be interested in this too.=C2=A0 I always assumed = it was ABRs, since they use it to test newborns...<div><br></div><div>best<= /div><div>Bhiksha</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr= " class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 9:32=E2=80=AFAM Malcolm Slan= ey &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:000001757ffb5fe1-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxx">00= 0001757ffb5fe1-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxx</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><block= quote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1= px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Is there a consensus about what= is the most *efficient* way to establish that there is an audio-brain-reco= rding connection?=C2=A0 By efficient I mean in terms of the least amount of= subject time.<br> <br> What I want to know is:=C2=A0 how can I mostly quickly establish that we ar= e picking up EEG signals *due* to an audio signal?<br> <br> I suspect ABRs, since they are used in infant screening.=C2=A0 FFRs seem in= teresting because they are continuous.=C2=A0 ERPs seem more problematic sin= ce they often have a low repetition rate.=C2=A0 (Acknowledging that strictl= y speaking the ABR is a form of ERP.)<br> <br> Is there a written comparison?<br> <br> Thanks.<br> <br> - Malcolm<br> </blockquote></div><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div><span class=3D"gmail_si= gnature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature">Bh= iksha Raj<br>Carnegie Mellon University<br>Pittsburgh, PA, USA<br>Tel: 412 = 268 9826</div> --0000000000002bf4b4061bfff96b--


This message came from the mail archive
postings/2024/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University