Subject: [AUDITORY] Sounds annotated with Roughness values (ECMA - 418 - 2, 2020) From: Toros Senan <toros.senan@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 11:17:21 +0100--0000000000000f60b705f5e82305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear List, I am looking for complex sounds with annotated roughness values to validate the Roughness model published in ECMA 418-2 as a standard. The standard does not provide these sounds, only a figure in the appendix comparing the model and jury test results. Unfortunately, ECMA did not respond to my inquiry. Hence validating my implementation with complex sounds became a bottleneck. I would be grateful if anyone of you has a set of complex sounds (consumer products, vehicle noise, etc.) and the roughness values calculated based on the ECMA. Best, Toros Senan --0000000000000f60b705f5e82305 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Dear List,=C2=A0<div><br></div><div>I am looking for compl= ex sounds with annotated roughness values to validate the Roughness model p= ublished in ECMA 418-2 as a standard. The standard does not provide these s= ounds, only a figure in the appendix comparing the model and jury test resu= lts. Unfortunately, ECMA did not respond to my inquiry. Hence validating my= implementation with complex sounds became a bottleneck.=C2=A0</div><div><b= r></div><div>I would be grateful if anyone of you has a set of complex soun= ds (consumer products, vehicle noise, etc.) and the roughness values calcul= ated based on the ECMA.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Best,=C2=A0</div><di= v><br></div><div>Toros Senan=C2=A0</div></div> --0000000000000f60b705f5e82305--