Re: [AUDITORY] Papers on lack of effect of musical training (matthew rosenthal )


Subject: Re: [AUDITORY] Papers on lack of effect of musical training
From:    matthew rosenthal  <rosent17@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:56:57 -0500

--000000000000f0416405ace35e4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This meta analysis found that the speech in noise advantage in musicians is not because of voice tagging in the early brainstem response. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31715197/ On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:50 PM Francesco Caprini <fcapri01@xxxxxxxx= > wrote: > Dear everyone, > > I'm currently conducting a literature review on the transfer of musical > expertise onto other domains of cognition, as part of a paper where I > compare musicians with sound engineers across a number of behavioural > tasks, i.e. psychophysics, auditory scene analysis, sustained selective > attention, and speech in noise perception. > > I am specifically interested in papers that *failed* to detect an > association between musicianship and any of these dimensions, which are > surprisingly (or unsurprisingly?) very hard to find via canonical search > engines. > > Would anyone know of any recent papers that might fit into this category? > > I=E2=80=99m only aware of the mixed literature on speech in noise percept= ion (see > refs below). > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. > > > Kind regards, > > Francesco > > > > **References** > > Ruggles, D. R., Freyman, R. L., & Oxenham, A. J. (2014). Influence of > musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise. > PLoS ONE, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086980 > > Boebinger, D., Evans, S., Rosen, S., Lima, C. F., Manly, T., & Scott, S. > K. (2015). Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving > masked speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(1), > 378=E2=80=93387. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4904537 > > Fuller, C. D., Galvin, J. J., Maat, B., Free, R. H., & Ba=C5=9Fkent, D. (= 2014). > The musician effect: Does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of > cochlear implant simulations? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8(8 JUN), 1=E2= =80=9316. > https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00179 > > Skoe, E., Camera, S., & Tufts, J. (2019). Noise exposure may diminish the > musician advantage for perceiving speech in noise. Ear and Hearing, 40(4)= , > 782=E2=80=93793. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000665 > > Madsen, S. M. K., Whiteford, K. L., & Oxenham, A. J. (2017). Musicians do > not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to > speech in competing speech backgrounds. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1=E2=80= =939. > https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12937-9 > > > ********************************************** > Francesco Caprini > PhD student in Auditory Neuroscience > Birkbeck, University of London > fcapri01@xxxxxxxx > ********************************************** > > --000000000000f0416405ace35e4d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div><div dir=3D"auto">This meta analysis found that the speech in noise ad= vantage in musicians is not because of voice tagging in the early brainstem= response. =C2=A0</div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">= <div><a href=3D"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31715197/">https://pubmed.n= cbi.nlm.nih.gov/31715197/</a></div></div><div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote= "><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:50 PM Fr= ancesco Caprini &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:fcapri01@xxxxxxxx">fcapri01@xxxxxxxx= l.bbk.ac.uk</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style= =3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;= padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)"><div style=3D"word-wra= p:break-word;line-break:after-white-space"><div style=3D"word-wrap:break-wo= rd;line-break:after-white-space"><div>Dear everyone,</div><div><br></div><d= iv>I&#39;m currently conducting a literature review on the transfer of musi= cal expertise onto other domains of cognition, as part of a paper where I c= ompare musicians with sound engineers across a number of behavioural tasks,= i.e. psychophysics, auditory scene analysis, sustained selective attention= , and speech in noise perception.</div><div><br></div><div>I am specificall= y interested in papers that=C2=A0<u>failed</u>=C2=A0to detect an associatio= n between musicianship and any of these dimensions, which are surprisingly = (or unsurprisingly?) very hard to find via canonical search engines.=C2=A0<= /div><div><br></div><div>Would anyone know of any recent papers that might = fit into this category?</div><div><br></div><div>I=E2=80=99m only aware of = the mixed literature on speech in noise perception (see refs below).</div><= div><br></div><div>Any help will be greatly appreciated.</div><div><br></di= v><div><br></div><div>Kind regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Francesco</div= ><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>**References**</div><div= ><br></div><div><div>Ruggles, D. R., Freyman, R. L., &amp; Oxenham, A. J. (= 2014). Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered = speech in noise. PLoS ONE, 9(1).=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://doi.org/10.1371/jo= urnal.pone.0086980" target=3D"_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.= 0086980</a></div><div><br></div><div>Boebinger, D., Evans, S., Rosen, S., L= ima, C. F., Manly, T., &amp; Scott, S. K. (2015). Musicians and non-musicia= ns are equally adept at perceiving masked speech. The Journal of the Acoust= ical Society of America, 137(1), 378=E2=80=93387.=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://d= oi.org/10.1121/1.4904537" target=3D"_blank">https://doi.org/10.1121/1.49045= 37</a></div><div><br></div><div>Fuller, C. D., Galvin, J. J., Maat, B., Fre= e, R. H., &amp; Ba=C5=9Fkent, D. (2014). The musician effect: Does it persi= st under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations? Frontie= rs in Neuroscience, 8(8 JUN), 1=E2=80=9316.=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://doi.org= /10.3389/fnins.2014.00179" target=3D"_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.= 2014.00179</a></div><div><br></div><div>Skoe, E., Camera, S., &amp; Tufts, = J. (2019). Noise exposure may diminish the musician advantage for perceivin= g speech in noise. Ear and Hearing, 40(4), 782=E2=80=93793.=C2=A0<a href=3D= "https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000665" target=3D"_blank">https://do= i.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000665</a></div><div><br></div><div>Madsen, S. = M. K., Whiteford, K. L., &amp; Oxenham, A. J. (2017). Musicians do not bene= fit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in c= ompeting speech backgrounds. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1=E2=80=939.=C2=A0<a= href=3D"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12937-9" target=3D"_blank">http= s://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12937-9</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></d= iv></div><div>**********************************************</div></div></d= iv><div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space"><div st= yle=3D"word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space"><div>Francesco Ca= prini</div><div>PhD student in Auditory Neuroscience</div><div>Birkbeck, Un= iversity of London</div><div><a href=3D"mailto:fcapri01@xxxxxxxx" tar= get=3D"_blank">fcapri01@xxxxxxxx</a></div><div><div>*****************= *****************************</div><div><br></div></div></div></div></block= quote></div></div> --000000000000f0416405ace35e4d--


This message came from the mail archive
src/postings/2020/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University