Re: [AUDITORY] Semantic McGurk Effect (Malcolm Slaney )

Subject: Re: [AUDITORY] Semantic McGurk Effect
From:    Malcolm Slaney  <malcolm@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:54:38 -0700

Thanks to all that responded.  This has been interesting and fun.

I don=E2=80=99t want to restart the discussion=E2=80=A6  but if I may =
summarize (and risk getting it wrong and starting a new flood of =
responses):

As others have said I think priming is probably the best way to describe =
this.  I was surprised that the result was so strong and changeable, =
even though I understood the process.

I now understand the McGurk effect is an example of cross-modal =
*integration* and that sounds different from priming.  All good.

Thanks everybody for the fun examples.

=E2=80=94 Malcolm
P.S.  And Bob, I=E2=80=99m always happy to shave my legs for science and =
you.  :-)