Subject: Re: [AUDITORY] Semantic McGurk Effect From: Bob Carlyon <Bob.Carlyon@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2020 10:16:27 +0000--_000_14566b3588fe493d8bcbf76cb078b3f9mrccbucamacuk_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Owen's point reminds me of a discussion on this list, maybe 20 years or so = ago. Someone remarked that when on a plane, listening to the engines warm u= p, they could sometimes hear tunes in that sound. One could to some extent = choose which tunes to hear. It's another example of the general phenomenon = that one can get percepts that plausibly map on to more than one stimulus, = and that the brain uses top-down information to carve out one route in that= map. I also like Julie's point: the demographic overlap between readers of early= text-to-speech articles and users of TikTok may not be as great as many of= us would wish :) Bob PS Remember planes? From: Owen Brimijoin <owen.brimijoin@xxxxxxxx> Sent: 08 August 2020 06:30 To: Bob Carlyon <Bob.Carlyon@xxxxxxxx>; AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Semantic McGurk Effect It definitely works with non words. If you play continuous noise with rando= mized spectra to people and ask them to press a button when they hear a par= ticular vowel sound in there, they quite happily do so. Even though you nev= er actually intentionally embed any vowel sound in the noise, when you aver= age the spectrograms of the signal just before each of all of the hundreds = of button presses, hey presto you see the spectrum of the vowel they were l= istening for. It's a little spooky. And very cool. Link to shameless self promotion: https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.4778264 - Owen. ________________________________ From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx<= mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx>> on behalf of Bob Carlyon <Bob.Carlyon@xxxxxxxx= -CBU.CAM.AC.UK<mailto:Bob.Carlyon@xxxxxxxx>> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 1:49:05 AM To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx<mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx> <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx= TS.MCGILL.CA<mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx>> Subject: Re: [AUDITORY] Semantic McGurk Effect Hi Malcolm Nice video. Kind of you to shave your legs for our benefit. I think this is an example of the general finding that prior information af= fects the perception of degraded speech, which has been extensively investi= gated with vocoded speech. When vocoded with few channels this can sound in= telligible, but sounds clear and obvious when preceded by either written or= spoken (clear speech) versions of the original. It's been found that this = kind of clear-then-distorted exposure speeds up learning so that it is eas= ier to recognise new sentences vocoded in the same way: Davis MH, Johnsrude IS, Hervais-Adelman A, Taylor K, McGettigan C (2005) Le= xical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence = from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental = Psychology-General 134:222-241. The difference between the video and most published studies is that the dis= torted speech could plausibly 'map onto' one of two sentences. My colleague= Matt Davis, in a public science lecture, had the audience play "vocoder bi= ngo", in which Matt played several vocoded words, and the audience were all= given cards with some words written on, and had to tick off each word when= they heard it. Much excitement ensued (I'm not sure what the prize was), b= ut the catch was that none o fthe words were actually presented - they were= just sufficiently similar/ambiguous to be convincing when paired with the = written text. Matt tells me that they have published an imaging study, look= ing at brain responses to ambiguous vocoded words when cued to hear them on= e way or another (e.g. 'pit' or 'kitsch'). This may be the closest publishe= d work to what you ask for: Blank, H., Spangenberg, M., Davis, M.H. (2018) Neural prediction errors dis= tinguish perception and misperception of speech. Journal of Neuroscience, 3= 8 (27) 6076-6089 https://www.jneurosci.org/content/38/27/6076<https://urldefense.proofpoint.= com/v2/url?u=3Dhttps-3A__www.jneurosci.org_content_38_27_6076&d=3DDwMFAg&c= =3D5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=3D1JJIPDmTuL_tCkct0bi-pWbDvJc5sFi9jAxNTivM9qg&m= =3DkR4B_0SrLlr5EB8KZHqST3b4PGwLalemzu1QfVp1jhU&s=3DYBZuMWtK_Y7_I07Gcf0gHCqh= F0Vz3lREtUyG81aWGQo&e=3D> Finally, I suspect that this is not a semantic effect as I expect it would = work with non-words All the best, Bob From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx<= mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx>> On Behalf Of Malcolm Slaney Sent: 07 August 2020 00:59 To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx<mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Semantic McGurk Effect Has there been anything formal published on this effect? https://www.iflscience.com/brain/what-the-hell-is-going-on-in-this-tikto= k-audio-illusion<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttps-3A__www= .iflscience.com_brain_what-2Dthe-2Dhell-2Dis-2Dgoing-2Don-2Din-2Dthis-2Dtik= tok-2Daudio-2Dillusion&d=3DDwMFAg&c=3D5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=3D1JJIPDmTuL= _tCkct0bi-pWbDvJc5sFi9jAxNTivM9qg&m=3DkR4B_0SrLlr5EB8KZHqST3b4PGwLalemzu1Qf= Vp1jhU&s=3DgrKa8Lx0CSd0hnCe61OObHI1uXFDTZ_gb_yd7tuAcz8&e=3D> It sounds to me like a semantic version of the McGurk effect. Nice demo. - Malcolm --_000_14566b3588fe493d8bcbf76cb078b3f9mrccbucamacuk_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"= > <meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"> <!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style><![endif]--><style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @xxxxxxxx {font-family:Wingdings; panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;} @xxxxxxxx {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @xxxxxxxx {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @xxxxxxxx {font-family:"Segoe UI"; panose-1:2 11 5 2 4 2 4 2 2 3;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0 {mso-style-name:msonormal; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0cm; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0cm; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;} p.xmsonormal, li.xmsonormal, div.xmsonormal {mso-style-name:x_msonormal; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;} p.xmsonormal0, li.xmsonormal0, div.xmsonormal0 {mso-style-name:x_msonormal0; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0cm; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0cm; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;} p.xmsochpdefault, li.xmsochpdefault, div.xmsochpdefault {mso-style-name:x_msochpdefault; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0cm; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0cm; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;} span.xmsohyperlink {mso-style-name:x_msohyperlink; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} span.xmsohyperlinkfollowed {mso-style-name:x_msohyperlinkfollowed; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} span.xemailstyle18 {mso-style-name:x_emailstyle18; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#1F497D;} span.EmailStyle24 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#1F497D;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; font-size:10.0pt;} @xxxxxxxx WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit"> <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--> </head> <body lang=3D"EN-GB" link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"purple"> <div class=3D"WordSection1"> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Ca= libri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Owen’= ;s point reminds me of a discussion on this list, maybe 20 years or so ago.= Someone remarked that when on a plane, listening to the engines warm up, they could sometimes hear tunes in that sound. One co= uld to some extent choose which tunes to hear. It’s another example o= f the general phenomenon that one can get percepts that plausibly map on to= more than one stimulus, and that the brain uses top-down information to carve out one route in that map. = <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Ca= libri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> = ;</o:p></span></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Ca= libri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">I also lik= e Julie’s point: the demographic overlap between readers of early tex= t-to-speech articles and users of TikTok may not be as great as many of us would wish </span><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;f= ont-family:Wingdings;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">J</span><spa= n style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;colo= r:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Ca= libri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> = ;</o:p></span></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Ca= libri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Bob<o:p></= o:p></span></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Ca= libri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> = ;</o:p></span></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Ca= libri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">PS Remembe= r planes?<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Ca= libri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> = ;</o:p></span></p> <div> <div style=3D"border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm = 0cm 0cm"> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><b><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;fo= nt-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span lang=3D"EN-= US" style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> = Owen Brimijoin <owen.brimijoin@xxxxxxxx> <br> <b>Sent:</b> 08 August 2020 06:30<br> <b>To:</b> Bob Carlyon <Bob.Carlyon@xxxxxxxx>; AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx= S.MCGILL.CA<br> <b>Subject:</b> Re: Semantic McGurk Effect<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> </div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> <div> <div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal">It definitely works with non words. If you play cont= inuous noise with randomized spectra to people and ask them to press a butt= on when they hear a particular vowel sound in there, they quite happily do = so. Even though you never actually intentionally embed any vowel sound in the noise, when you average the spe= ctrograms of the signal just before each of all of the hundreds of button p= resses, hey presto you see the spectrum of the vowel they were listening fo= r. <o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal">It’s a little spooky. And very cool. <o:p></o:= p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal">Link to shameless self promotion: <o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><a href=3D"https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.4= 778264">https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.4778264</a><o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal">- Owen. <o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> <div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> </div> </div> <div class=3D"MsoNormal" align=3D"center" style=3D"text-align:center"> <hr size=3D"3" width=3D"98%" align=3D"center"> </div> <div id=3D"divRplyFwdMsg"> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><b><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"= ;Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">From:</span></b><span style=3D"font-= size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> AUDITO= RY - Research in Auditory Perception <</span><a href=3D"mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx= LISTS.MCGILL.CA"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri&= quot;,sans-serif">AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx</span></a><span style=3D"font-si= ze:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">> on behalf of Bob Carlyon <</span><a href=3D"mailto:Bob.Carlyon@xxxxxxxx= CAM.AC.UK"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",= sans-serif">Bob.Carlyon@xxxxxxxx</span></a><span style=3D"font-siz= e:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">><br> <b>Sent:</b> Friday, August 7, 2020 1:49:05 AM<br> <b>To:</b> </span><a href=3D"mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx"><span style= =3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx= ISTS.MCGILL.CA</span></a><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"= Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> <</span><a href=3D"mailto:AUDITOR= Y@xxxxxxxx"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibr= i",sans-serif">AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx</span></a><span style=3D"font-= size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">><br= > <b>Subject:</b> Re: [AUDITORY] Semantic McGurk Effect</span> <o:p></o:p></p= > <div> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p> </div> </div> <div> <div> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Hi Malcolm</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Nice video. Kind of you to shave you= r legs for our benefit.</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">I think this is an example of the ge= neral finding that prior information affects the perception of degraded spe= ech, which has been extensively investigated with vocoded speech. When vocoded with few channels this can sound intelligible= , but sounds clear and obvious when preceded by either written or spoken (c= lear speech) versions of the original. It’s been found that this kind= of clear-then-distorted exposure speeds up learning so that it is easier to recognise new sentences vocoded in the= same way:</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal" style=3D"margin-left:36.0pt;text-indent:-36.0pt;tex= t-autospace:none"> <span style=3D"font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif"= >Davis MH, Johnsrude IS, Hervais-Adelman A, Taylor K, McGettigan C (2005) L= exical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence= from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 134:222-241.</span><o:p></o:p><= /p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">The difference between the video and= most published studies is that the distorted speech could plausibly ‘= ;map onto’ one of two sentences. My colleague Matt Davis, in a public science lecture, had the audience play “vocoder bingo= 221;, in which Matt played several vocoded words, and the audience were all= given cards with some words written on, and had to tick off each word when= they heard it. Much excitement ensued (I’m not sure what the prize was), but the catch was that none o fthe words wer= e actually presented – they were just sufficiently similar/ambiguous = to be convincing when paired with the written text. Matt tells me that they= have published an imaging study, looking at brain responses to ambiguous vocoded words when cued to hear them one w= ay or another (e.g. ‘pit’ or ‘kitsch’). This may be= the closest published work to what you ask for:</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif">Blank, H., Spangenberg, M., Davis, M.H. (2018) Neu= ral prediction errors distinguish perception and misperception of speech. J= ournal of Neuroscience, 38 (27) 6076-6089</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><a href=3D"https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url= ?u=3Dhttps-3A__www.jneurosci.org_content_38_27_6076&d=3DDwMFAg&c=3D= 5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=3D1JJIPDmTuL_tCkct0bi-pWbDvJc5sFi9jAxNTivM9qg&= amp;m=3DkR4B_0SrLlr5EB8KZHqST3b4PGwLalemzu1QfVp1jhU&s=3DYBZuMWtK_Y7_I07= Gcf0gHCqhF0Vz3lREtUyG81aWGQo&e=3D"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font= -family:"Calibri",sans-serif">https://www.jneurosci.org/content/3= 8/27/6076</span></a><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Finally, I suspect that this is not = a semantic effect as I expect it would work with non-words</span><o:p></o:p= ></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">All the best,</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Bob</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"C= alibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p> <div> <div style=3D"border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm = 0cm 0cm"> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"><b><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;f= ont-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span lang=3D"EN= -US" style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">= AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <</span><a href=3D"mailto:AU= DITORY@xxxxxxxx"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font= -family:"Calibri",sans-serif">AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx</span></a>= <span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri&qu= ot;,sans-serif">> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Malcolm Slaney<br> <b>Sent:</b> 07 August 2020 00:59<br> <b>To:</b> </span><a href=3D"mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx"><span lang=3D= "EN-US" style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-seri= f">AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx</span></a><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-si= ze:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><br> <b>Subject:</b> Semantic McGurk Effect</span><o:p></o:p></p> </div> </div> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"> <o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3D"xmsonormal">Has there been anything formal published on this ef= fect?<o:p></o:p></p> <div> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"> <a href=3D"https://urldefense.proofpoi= nt.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttps-3A__www.iflscience.com_brain_what-2Dthe-2Dhell-2Dis= -2Dgoing-2Don-2Din-2Dthis-2Dtiktok-2Daudio-2Dillusion&d=3DDwMFAg&c= =3D5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=3D1JJIPDmTuL_tCkct0bi-pWbDvJc5sFi9jAxNTivM9= qg&m=3DkR4B_0SrLlr5EB8KZHqST3b4PGwLalemzu1QfVp1jhU&s=3DgrKa8Lx0CSd0= hnCe61OObHI1uXFDTZ_gb_yd7tuAcz8&e=3D" target=3D"_blank"><span style=3D"= font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1155CC;background:white">ht= tps://www.iflscience.com/brain/what-the-hell-is-going-on-in-this-tiktok-aud= io-illusion</span></a><o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"> <o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"xmsonormal">It sounds to me like a semantic version of the McGu= rk effect.<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"> <o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"xmsonormal">Nice demo.<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"> <o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"xmsonormal">- Malcolm<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class=3D"xmsonormal"> <o:p></o:p></p> </div> </div> </div> </div> </body> </html> --_000_14566b3588fe493d8bcbf76cb078b3f9mrccbucamacuk_--