Re: [AUDITORY] Headphones For Online Experiments (Bob Masta )

Subject: Re: [AUDITORY] Headphones For Online Experiments
From:    Bob Masta  <audio@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:45:10 -0400

On top of the technical specs issue there is the issue of 
variability in fit for individual users.  I suspect this may 
overshadow published frequency response in many 
cases. Any ideas on how to control for that?

Bob Masta

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
On 22 Jun 2020 at 10:20, Timothy Foley wrote:

> 
> Dear AUDITORY,
> 
> With the current online-only participant pool, my lab has been dealing w=
ith how to best 
> categorize/code participants headphones. Currently, we have RA's coding =
headphones for specs 
> such as (wireless or wired, open-closed, etc) which are pretty easy to f=
ind online. However more 
> technical specifications, such as the ubiquitous frequency response rang=
e, are difficult to find for 
> some of the headphones. (e.g. no official freq range spec for Airpods).
> 
> So I am looking for any resources that might help make this coding easie=
r. Whether it be 
> databases, papers, etc that has specs for popular consumer-grade headpho=
nes.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Liam
> 
> --
> Liam Foley, B.Sc. (Hons)
> (He/Him/His)
> 
> M.Sc. Student
> 
> Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Map icon location: Togo Salmon Hall, 422
> Phone icon phone: 905 525 9140
> Envelope icon email: foleyt@xxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> Twitter icon 
> 
> McMaster University Brighter World logo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>