Re: USB sound cards (Bob Masta )

Subject: Re: USB sound cards
From:    Bob Masta  <audio@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Sun, 14 Dec 2014 09:15:19 -0500

On 13 Dec 2014 at 21:59, Richard F. Lyon wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Bob Masta <audio@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It's the other way around: Adding resistance in the > > driving circuit gives poorer damping. "Damping Factor" for > > a power amplifier is the reciprocal of output impedance. > > > > Bob, I wasn't aware of that definition. > I was thinking of > rather than Oops, you are correct... I should have said it is *proportional* to the reciprocal. > Is there an understanding of why high "damping factor" would be good? > Jont's findings suggest otherwise (I believe he's saying the current is > typically more relevant than the volage). > The second reference you cited covers it under "Explanation". Basically, a conventional electrodynamic speaker is both a motor and a generator. Imagine that the speaker receives a momentary voltage pulse, after which is is instantly disconnected from the source. The speaker would ring at its resonant frequency, damped only by friction. The generator would be creating a voltage, but no current, so no load to add damping. However, if instead of disconnection the leads were *shorted* after the pulse, the generator would be driving all its current into the zero-ohm load, giving a maximum damping effect. Conventional loudspeakers are designed to be driven by voltage sources, not current sources. The current may be more "relevant" (in the sense of force generation), but not for getting a flat frequency response from a conventional speaker design. (Although there have been occasional attempts at current drive, the ones I recall required special dedicated amplifiers.) Best regards, Bob Masta D A Q A R T A Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis Scope, Spectrum, Spectrogram, Signal Generator Science with your sound card!

This message came from the mail archive
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University