Re: USB sound cards (Jont Allen )

Subject: Re: USB sound cards
From:    Jont Allen  <jontalle@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:47:52 -0600

Steve and list, My student Noori Kim and I have looked into some of these questions in detail. Here is a paper we gave at the ASA meeting. They put us in the wrong session. There was a special session on Historic transducers, on Tuesday, and they put us in a regular transducer session, on Thurs. It was an unfortunate mistake, for us. In this presentation it shows how the current is the drive to the flux, which is the source of the force. Thus it is not the current that drives the pressure, it is the current. By placing a resistor in series with the drive-amplifier, you can reduce the distortion, as you come closer to a current source. Here is the presentation we gave at the ASA meeting. Noori's PhD theis is now available, as well as her publication in hearing research, which is a reference in the ASA talk. Kim and Allen (2014) "Historic transducers: Balanced Armature Receiver (BAR)," ASA meeting INDY, IN, Oct 30, 2014 Kim, Noori and Allen, J.B. (2013). "Two-port network Analysis and Modeling of a Balanced Armature Receiver, "Hearing Research, special MEMRO 2013 issue Jont FROM: Jont Allen Sent: Dec 13 5:05AM, 2014 Steve, Are these claims about magnetic earphones, or electrostatic earphones? They must be direct drive, by a voltage, which then creates a current. Right? Otherwise this makes no sense that it would depend on the source impedance. Right? Following up on this then, the difference is in the current vs voltage. If the impedance is nonlinear (it is in a magnetic earphone), then this makes sense. The flux vs current has a non-linear relationship. This is well documented in the literature actually. It is the flux that creates the force on the diaphragm in magnetic drive. Driving the inductive impedance with a current source would be an alternative if it were not for the instability that ensues. Have you ever tried to drive an inductor with a current source? Do you know what happens? Jont On 12/12/2014 05:36 PM, Steve Beet wrote: > This may be a red herring, but I've seen some self-proclaimed "audiophile" > publications which claim that when headphones are driven from a resistive > source impedance of a few tens of Ohms, they "sound better" than when they > are driven from an ideal (very low impedance) voltage source. As far as I > recall, these statements were referring to listening tests of > professional-quality headphones with nominal impedances of 200 Ohms. > > These publications didn't present any analytical measurements to suggest why > this might be the case, but the output resistance added to many headphone > amps might not be there solely to prevent damage or distortion - it might > also be to persuade audiophiles that they're getting the best sound quality. > > For music produced and mixed to be listened to via loudspeakers, it may be > that adding a series resistor might indeed make the headphones sound more > like the original mixing engineer or producer intended, but for scientific > perceptual experiments I can't see any advantage in artificially increasing > the resistance. > > Steve Beet > > > -----Original Message----- > From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception > [mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx On Behalf Of Bob Masta > Sent: 11 December 2014 17:03 > To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: USB sound cards > > However, there *is* a problem getting low output impedance as well. The > native design of modern amplifier stages has essentially zero output > impedance due to negative feedback (milliohms or less). That means that if > you connect such an amp to a low-impedance load, the current draw can be > high... high enough to damage the output stages, or at least cause massive > distortion as they go into protective current limiting. Since these are for > consumer use, where anyone can plug in most anything that fits the jack, > manufacturer's typically add some output impedance. >

This message came from the mail archive
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University