results for the favorite paper poll (Stefan Bleeck )

Subject: results for the favorite paper poll From: Stefan Bleeck <bleeck@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:11:07 +0100 List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY> --047d7b414118e2fb9204fa64c987 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks to the nine people who responded! And the winner (so far) is =E2=80=A6 with two nominations =E2=80=A6 drum ro= ll =E2=80=A6 =C2=B7 Kujawa, Sharon G., and M. Charles Liberman. "Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after =E2=80=9Ctemporary=E2=80=9D noise= -induced hearing loss." The Journal of Neuroscience 29.45 (2009): 14077-14085. Why? =E2=80=9Creally made me re-think noise exposure and supra-threshold he= aring impairments. I found it physiology-intensive for my little audiologist's mind, but as far as I can tell the work is very carefully performed, and the conclusions appropriate....and sobering=E2=80=9C All other papers got one nomination (in no particular order, and with reason, if there was one) =C2=B7 Dean, Isabel, Nicol S. Harper, and David McAlpine. "Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics." Nature neuroscience 8.12 (2005): 1684-1689. =C2=B7 Zilany, Muhammad SA, and Laurel H. Carney. "Power-law dynamic= s in an auditory-nerve model can account for neural adaptation to sound-level statistics." The Journal of Neuroscience 30.31 (2010): 10380-10390. =C2=B7 Jonathan B Fritz, Mounya Elhilali, Stephen V David and Shihab= A Shamma =E2=80=9CAuditory attention =E2=80=94 focusing the searchlight on so= und=E2=80=9D Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2007, 17:437=E2=80=93455 =C2=B7 Yamashita T, Fang J, Gao J, Yu Y, Lagarde MM, Zuo J. =E2=80= =9CNormal hearing sensitivity at low-to-middle frequencies with 34% prestin-charge density.=E2=80=9DPLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045= 453. =C2=B7 Chen F, Zha D, Fridberger A, Zheng J, Choudhury N, Jacques SL, Wang RK, Shi X, Nuttall AL. =E2=80=9CA differentially amplified motion = in the ear for near-threshold sound detection.=E2=80=9D Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jun;14(6):770-4. doi: 10.1038/nn.2827 o Because: =E2=80=9Cinspires students=E2=80=9D, is =E2=80=9Cground breaki= ng=E2=80=9D This papers describes new methods, and the results question the ancient dogma that hearing sensitivity be dependent upon basilar membrane sensitivity. The results indicate that the prime sensors are the outer hair cells (OHC), not the basilar membrane. =C2=B7 May, B. J. (2000). =E2=80=9CRole of the dorsal cochlear nucle= us in the sound localization behavior of cats. =E2=80=9CHearing research, 148(1), 74-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00142-8 o Why important -- interpretation of the data is flawed: A major assumption in sound localization has been that elevation localization and front-back determination relies on monaural spectral processing, and furthermore, that that processing occurs in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). This study (May2000) has often been cited as 'proving' that major assumption. Perhaps surprisingly, May's experimental results do NOT at all support that conclusion. The theory for sound localization where it concerns the DCN's output being severed from the IC has certain expected results. However, since the experimental results still show robust elevation localization, that expectation is not met. [One needs only to examine figure 5, column C] What does that mean for a major assumption in sound localization? =C2=B7 Keyrouz, F., & Diepold, K. (2006). =E2=80=9CAn enhanced binau= ral 3D sound localization algorithm=E2=80=9D. Signal Processing and Information Technolo= gy, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 662-665). IEEE. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ISSPIT.2006.270883 o Why important -- shows very accurate binaural localization using a simple method: Although not the first paper to show this approach (Duda1993 for example), it does show an accurate localization method that has biological significance -- all summarized in Fig 2. Importantly, the method is source spectrum independent and useful with very brief sounds. That is, monaural spectral analysis is not necessary for most locations. The method becomes hugely significance because the HRTFs are not really needed; only the ear signal division for any sound needs to be remembered for a location. =C2=B7 Shera and Guinan (1999) =E2=80=9CEvoked otoacoustic emissions= arise by two fundamentally different mechanism: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs=E2=80=9D. = JASA, 105, 782-798. DOI 10.1121/1.4763989 o I appreciate this is outside the time limit of past 10 years (a later version was written for a clinical audience in 2004) but it is a must read for any OAE scholar and represented a shift in how OAE generation was understood. It is incredibly well written, with the write up of the thought experiment involving demons with their timepieces standing out for me. =C2=B7 Arlinger, S., Lunner, T., Lyxell, B., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2009). =E2=80=9CThe emergence of cognitive hearing science. Scandinavian j= ournal of psychology=E2=80=9D, 50(5), 371=E2=80=93384. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.200= 9.00753.x =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D I would be very interested in further nominations. I am sure more than 9 people have an opinion... cheers, Stefan --=20 Dr. Stefan Bleeck Hearing and Balance Centre Institute of Sound and Vibration Research Faculty of Engineering and the Environment University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK Room 4093, Tizard building (13) bleeck@xxxxxxxx Tel.: 02380 596682 --047d7b414118e2fb9204fa64c987 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div>=C2=A0 </div> =C2=A0 Thanks to the nine people who responded! And the winner (so far) is =E2=80=A6 with two nomina= tions =E2=80=A6 drum roll =E2=80=A6 =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Kujawa, Sharon G., and M. Charles Liberman. "Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneratio= n after =E2=80=9Ctemporary=E2=80=9D noise-induced hearing loss."=C2=A0Th= e Journal of Neuroscience=C2=A029.45 (2009): 14077-14085. Why? =E2=80=9Creally made me re-think noise exposure and supra-threshold hearing impairments. I found it physiology-intensive for my little audiologist's mind, but as far as I can tell the work is very ca= refully performed, and the conclusions appropriate....and sobering=E2=80=9C<= /p> =C2=A0 All other papers got one nomination (in no particula= r order, and with reason, if there was one) =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Dean, Isabel, Nicol S. Harper, and David McAlpine. "Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics."=C2=A0Nature neuroscience=C2=A08.12 (20= 05): 1684-1689.=C2=A0 =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Zilany, Muhammad SA, and Laurel H. Carney. "Power-law dynamics in an auditory-nerve model can account for neural adaptation to sound-level statistics."=C2=A0The Jou= rnal of Neuroscience=C2=A030.31 (2010): 10380-10390.=C2=A0 =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Jonathan B Fritz, Mounya Elhilali, Stephen V David and Shihab A Shamma =E2=80=9CAuditory attention = =E2=80=94 focusing the searchlight on sound=E2=80=9D Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2007, 17:= 437=E2=80=93455 =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Yamashita T,=C2=A0Fang J,=C2=A0Gao J,=C2=A0Yu Y,=C2=A0Lagarde MM,=C2=A0Zuo J. =E2=80=9CNormal hear= ing sensitivity at low-to-middle frequencies with 34% prestin-charge density.= =E2=80=9DPLoS One.=C2=A02012;7(9):e45453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045453.=C2=A0 =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Chen F,=C2=A0Zha D,=C2=A0Fridberger A,=C2=A0Zheng J,=C2=A0Choudhury N,=C2=A0Jacques SL,=C2=A0Wang RK,=C2=A0Shi X,=C2=A0Nuttall AL. =E2=80=9CA differentially am= plified motion in the ear for near-threshold sound detection.=E2=80=9D Nat Neurosci= .=C2=A02011 Jun;14(6):770-4. doi: 10.1038/nn.2827 o=C2=A0=C2=A0 Because: =E2=80=9Cinspires students=E2=80=9D, is =E2=80=9Cground breaking=E2=80=9D This papers describ= es new methods, and the results question the ancient dogma that hearing sensitivity be dependent up= on basilar membrane sensitivity. The results indicate that the prime sensors a= re the outer hair cells (OHC), not the basilar membrane. =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 May, B. J. (2000). =E2=80=9CRole of the dorsal cochlear nucleus in the sound localization behavior of cats. =E2= =80=9CHearing research, 148(1), 74-87.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0<a href= =3D"http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00142-8">http://dx.doi.org/10.1= 016/S0378-5955(00)00142-8</a> o=C2=A0=C2=A0 Why important -- interpretation of the data is flawed: A major assumption in sound localizat= ion has been that elevation localization and front-back determination relies on monaural spectral processing, and furthermore, that that processing occurs = in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). This study (May2000) has often been cite= d as 'proving' that major assumption. Perhaps surprisingly, May's ex= perimental results do NOT at all support that conclusion.=C2=A0 The theory for sound localization where it concerns the DCN's output being severed from the = IC has certain expected results. However, since the experimental results still sho= w robust elevation localization, that expectation is not met. [One needs only= to examine figure 5, column C] What does that mean for a major assumption in s= ound localization?=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Keyrouz, F., & Diepold, K. (2006). =E2=80=9CAn enhanced binaural 3D sound localization algorithm=E2= =80=9D. Signal Processing and Information Technology, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 662-665). IEEE.=C2=A0=C2=A0<a href=3D"http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ISSP= IT.2006.270883">http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ISSPIT.2006.2708= 83</a> o=C2=A0=C2=A0 Why important -- shows very accurate binaural localization using a simple method: Although not the firs= t paper to show this approach (Duda1993 for example), it does show an accurat= e localization method that has biological significance -- all summarized in F= ig 2.=C2=A0 Importantly, the method is source spectrum independent and useful = with very brief sounds. That is, monaural spectral analysis is not necessary for most locations. The method becomes hugely significance because the HRTFs ar= e not really needed; only the ear signal division for any sound needs to be remembered for a location.=C2=A0 =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Shera and Guinan (1999) =E2=80=9CEvoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanism: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs=E2=80=9D. JASA, 105, 782-798.=C2=A0 DOI =C2=A010.1121/1.4763989 o=C2=A0=C2=A0 I appreciate this is outside the time limit of past 10 years (a later version was written for a clinical audience in 2004) but it is a must read for any OAE scholar and represented a shift in how OAE generation was understood.=C2=A0 It is incredibly well written, with the write up of the thought experiment involv= ing demons with their timepieces standing out for me. =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Arlinger, S., Lunner, T., Lyxell, B., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2009). =E2=80=9CThe emergence of c= ognitive hearing science. Scandinavian journal of psychology=E2=80=9D, 50(5), 371=E2= =80=93384. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00753.x =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3DI would be very interested in fur= ther nominations. I am sure more than 9 people have an opinion... cheers,Stefan = <div> </div>-- Dr. Stefan Bleeck Hearing and Balance Centre In= stitute of Sound and Vibration Research Faculty of Engineering and the E= nvironment University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK Room 4093, Tizard building (13)<= br><a href=3D"mailto:bleeck@xxxxxxxx" target=3D"_blank">bleeck@xxxxxxxx</= a> Tel.: 02380 596682 </div> --047d7b414118e2fb9204fa64c987--

This message came from the mail archive
/var/www/postings/2014/
maintained by:

DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University