Subject: Re: slightly OT: raw audio file format From: Enrico Marchetto <marchet1@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:18:42 +0200 List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>Wavesurfer, from KTH, usually is able to guess correctly the raw data format; moreover, it has an intuitive interface for the "trial and error" procedure. Enrico. Il 01/06/2011 12:47, John Culling ha scritto: > Trial and error. I should try 44.1 kHz 16-bit stereo first. > CoolEdit/Audition is good at reinterpreting raw data > however you say. > > John. > >>>> Massimo Grassi<massimo.grassi@xxxxxxxx> 01 June 2011 11:00:59>>> > Dear list members, > > I've been asked by a friend to work on a recording. The recording file > extension is "raw". I'm not familiar with this type of file. As far as I > understood this file-type is an uncompressed audio file with no header > information. > > Here come the questions: > 1. Are the above information correct? > 2. Is there any other info missing? > 3. How do I understand sample rate and bit resolution if the file has no > header? > > Thank you all in advance, > m >