Re: frequency to mel formula ("Richard F. Lyon" )


Subject: Re: frequency to mel formula
From:    "Richard F. Lyon"  <DickLyon@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:43:20 -0800
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

Thanks so much! I await your findings. Dick At 7:24 AM +0000 3/10/11, Arne Leijon wrote: >I can go to the library and look at those reports, but probably not >until next week. >There are actually two reports, >one about vowel sounds, from 1948, and the cited one >about consonant sounds, from 1949. > >I will look into both, just in case Gunnar Fant cited the wrong one. > >Arne Leijon > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:03:45 -0800 >> From: "Richard F. Lyon" <DickLyon@xxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: frequency to mel formula >> >> Can I get a volunteer in Stockholm to help with this mel formula quest? >> >> Cecilia at the National Library of Sweden=20 >> ("Info-kb-se" <info@xxxxxxxx>) has found the 1949=20 >> =46ant report, and says "I have now glanced through=20 >> the book twice without finding the formula you=20 >> are looking for." >> >> If someone who knows what they're looking for and=20 >> reads Swedish has the time to look better, it=20 >> would really be interesting to know what Fant=20 >> referred to when he said "This formula, discussed=20 >> in more detail earlier (Fant, 1949), is a better=20 >> approximation than the Koenig scale..." >> >> Dick


This message came from the mail archive
/home/empire6/dpwe/public_html/postings/2011/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University