Re: Singing repositories available & bit depth/sample rate advices (Coralie Vincent )


Subject: Re: Singing repositories available & bit depth/sample rate advices
From:    Coralie Vincent  <coralie.vincent@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Sun, 6 Mar 2011 00:14:40 +0100
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

Hello, Thank you for the explanations. I just want to precise that the kind of repositories we are interested in could also be people recorded singing not for experimental psychology studies. It could be collections of folksongs, for example. So, contact me if you know such a database or have been involved in the creation of it! Coralie Jose Ignacio Alcantara <jia10@xxxxxxxx> a écrit : > Yes, when people sightread, either as a result of good relative or > absolute pitch, they often report that they can hear the note in > their 'heads', internally without any vocal production. The only > difference b/w relative and absolute pitch, in this regard, is that > the former need a starting basis, e.g. memory for a 440-Hz A, whereas > the latter are able to do this in the absence of any reference notes; > their pitch measure being 'absolute', as it were... > Jose -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Avant d'imprimer ce mail, réfléchissons à l'impact sur l'environnement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This message came from the mail archive
/home/empire6/dpwe/public_html/postings/2011/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University