Re: F0 estimation software (Stefanie Stadler Elmer )


Subject: Re: F0 estimation software
From:    Stefanie Stadler Elmer  <stefanie.stadler@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:45:07 +0200
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

Hi Heriberto the hint to praat is useful. Praat is very powerful and wonderful! Especially for speech analysis. However, our pitch analyzer is much easier to handle, because it is specifically targeted to calculate pitch in everyday singing (not opera voice): http://mmatools.sourceforge.net/ Moreover, at this source you find a new notation system for representing singing (notation viewer). Open source, free. Cheers, Stefanie Stadler Heriberto Avelino wrote: > You may try > http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/ > > It includes full documentation of the algorithms used. > > Best wishes, > > Heriberto > > ********************************************************************************* > Conference on Phonetic Universals October 29-30, 2010 > Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig (Germany) > http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/conference/10-PhoneticUniversals > ********************************************************** > Heriberto Avelino > Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology > Department of Linguistics > Deutscher Platz 6 > 04103 Leipzig > > Phone: +49 (0) 341 3550 - 316 > Fax: +49 (0) 341 3550 - 333 > ********************************************************** > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Federman, Jeremy > <jeremy.federman@xxxxxxxx > <mailto:jeremy.federman@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Hi all - > > We have a graduate student here who is currently investigating the > role of > motor cognition in singing. Specifically, she is recording > professional > singers and non-singers singing familiar tunes in their preferred key > during masked and unmasked conditions. That is, for some trials the > participants can hear themselves singing and for others they cannot. > > The purpose of this post is to ask for your help and advice regarding > software we might potentially use (matlab or other) to automate the > process of estimating the fundamental frequency (also known as pitch > detection or F0 estimation) of periodic segments contained in the > recorded > waveforms. If there are known advantages and disadvantages to various > options, please feel free to include that information as well. > > Thannks in advance for any and all assistance and guidance on this > topic! > > With kind regards, > > Jeremy > -- > Jeremy Federman, PhD-ABD, CCC-A > Vanderbilt University Medical Center > Department of Hearing and Speech > 1215 21st Avenue South, Room 8310 > Medical Center East, South Tower > Nashville, TN 37232-8242 > Email: jeremy.federman@xxxxxxxx > > -- PD Dr. Stefanie Stadler Elmer University of Zürich Dept. of Psychology Binzmühlestr. 14 Box 9 CH-8050 Zürich Switzerland +41 (0)44 635 74 38


This message came from the mail archive
/home/empire6/dpwe/public_html/postings/2010/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University