Subject: Re: comparing cochlear models ? From: Jon Boley <jdb@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 10:02:12 -0400 List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>Emad, I did a class project several years ago in which I tried to do this. (See http://www.jboley.com/research/een698report.doc) However, looking back, I really don't think that my comparison to Schroeder's masking curves was the an appropriate approach. (Notice that I called the Schroeder curves the "actual ear response"... which I'm sure is not even close to accurate!) I'd be very interested to see what others suggest. - Jon On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:04 AM, emad burke <emad.burke@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear list > > > I am trying to find a metric which i can compare different cochlear models > based on. in other words i need a "quantitative" metric which there is a > consensus on in the whole community and its widely accepted. Of course i > dont mean a metric like "how biologically plausible a cochlear model is" > since i dont think it is quantifiable. as a simple example if you were going > to compare the traditional Dick Lyons old cochlear model with the one that > i'm developing myself how am i supposed to compare them and conclude which > ones superior ? > > Best Regards > Emad >