Subject: comparing cochlear models ? From: emad burke <emad.burke@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:04:17 +0200 List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>--001485f893dc757ca20486f21865 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear list I am trying to find a metric which i can compare different cochlear models based on. in other words i need a "quantitative" metric which there is a consensus on in the whole community and its widely accepted. Of course i dont mean a metric like "how biologically plausible a cochlear model is" since i dont think it is quantifiable. as a simple example if you were going to compare the traditional Dick Lyons old cochlear model with the one that i'm developing myself how am i supposed to compare them and conclude which ones superior ? Best Regards Emad --001485f893dc757ca20486f21865 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear list<br><br><br>I am trying to find a metric which i can compare diffe= rent cochlear models based on. in other words i need a "quantitative&q= uot; metric which there is a consensus on in the whole community and its wi= dely accepted. Of course i dont mean a metric like "how biologically p= lausible a cochlear model is" since i dont think it is quantifiable. a= s a simple example if you were going to compare the traditional Dick Lyons = old cochlear model with the one that i'm developing myself how am i sup= posed to compare them and conclude which ones superior ?<br> <br>Best Regards<br>Emad<br> --001485f893dc757ca20486f21865--