Subject: Re: Usual settings for the transformed up-down procedure From: Sylvain BUSSON <Sylvain.BUSSON@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:08:38 +0200 List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --=_alternative 004DB211C12575C5_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Dear all, The adaptive up-dow procedure offers many benefits over methode of constants. Does anyone know if one of theses benefits is related to the number of repetition for each condition ? In other words, can we get a reliable threshold estimate with only 3 repetitions (3 tracks for the same condition) ? Sylvain BUSSON Research Ingineer ENSIETA DTN/SOHO 00 33 2.98.34.88.81 sylvain.busson@xxxxxxxx --=_alternative 004DB211C12575C5_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Dear all,</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The adaptive up-dow procedure offers many benefits over methode of constants.</font> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Does anyone know if one of theses benefits is related to the number of repetition for each condition ? </font> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">In other words, can we get a reliable threshold estimate with only 3 repetitions (3 tracks for the same condition) ? </font> <br> <br> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Sylvain BUSSON<br> Research Ingineer<br> ENSIETA DTN/SOHO<br> 00 33 2.98.34.88.81<br> sylvain.busson@xxxxxxxx</font> --=_alternative 004DB211C12575C5_=--