Subject: OT: email format From: Kevin Austin <kevin.austin@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:24:47 -0400 List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>There are some formating issues with how the digest sends out postings. This is not my area of expertise but I am told by an IT person that it's a combination of the sender and the way the digest-maker works. It can look like this: > Cochlea", Physiological Review 81, 1306-1352; the upper part of=20 Fig.=20 > 14 shows data of Russell and Nilsen on guinea-pig BM=20 displacement=20 > versus cochlear longitudinal position x_a in response to 15-kHz=20 > sinusoidal tones; x_a, the distance from the apex, ranges from=20 13.5=20 > to 17 mm; BM length is about 19 mm; so x_b, the distance from=20 the=20 > base, ranges from about 2 to 5.5 mm. At sound pressure levels=20 (SPL)=20 > of 15, 20, 25, ... , 60, 70 dB there is an active peak at about=20 x_a =3D=20 > 14.47 mm. At SPL =3D 55, 60, ... , 90, 100 dB there is a passive=20 peak=20 > at about x_a =3D 15.86 mm. At SPL < 55 dB no data are shown in=20 the=20 > passive-peak x_a-region.=20 >=20 For visually impaired readers, or others who have text to voice readers, this is problematic. Best wishes Kevin