Subject: Re: Cochlea Amplifier models : a new list From: Martin Braun <nombraun@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:39:20 +0200 List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>I have now seen that the paper can also be downloaded: http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/reprint/37/6/1156?ijkey=31b75671bc6ad3014949ac04154809ec6d4ade00&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha The data that you had requested are in Figs. 7A-D and Fig. 8, the most crucial ones being in Figs. 7A and 7B. Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard F. Lyon" <DickLyon@xxxxxxxx> To: <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 11:05 PM Subject: Re: Cochlea Amplifier models : a new list > Martin, > > I'm still not clear on which data you're referring to. As I said, I can't > access that paper with the Figure 7B. Is that the one whose data you're > referring to? Can you (or Erik) send me a copy please? > > Dick > > At 9:55 PM +0200 10/11/07, Martin Braun wrote: >>Dick, >> >>the neural data are not missing. You spent many words on data that you >>could not find in your library, and even questioned if these data exist. >>This is not science! Erik Larsen apparently has found the data. Please ask >>him if the data exist. >> >>By the way, nobody has suppressed THESE data. The were published in a top >>journal. The problem is that Ruggero and others have chosen not to include >>them in their reviews of the relation of BM vs. neural behavior. And >>guess: WHY could they have chosen not to include them ??? >> >>Martin >