Re: Cochlea Amplifier models : a new list ("Richard F. Lyon" )


Subject: Re: Cochlea Amplifier models : a new list
From:    "Richard F. Lyon"  <DickLyon@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:55:21 -0700
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

At 5:39 PM +0200 10/10/07, Martin Braun wrote: >>I haven't been able to find the evidence for the assertion that >>neural tuning remains unchanged in some way that differs from the >>sense in which BM tuning remains unchanged; >[.......] >>Where should I look to study the data on this idea that underlies >>your modeling approach? > >You can take any data on level dependence of neural responses. None >of them mirrors the half-octave shift of BM tuning. I've looked at lots of data, and you must be interpreting it differently from how I am. So if you have something specific that we can look at and discuss, we can try to resolve that difference. Lacking that, I'll stick with Ruggero's interpretation that says mechanical and neural are essentially the same, not different. Dick


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2007/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University