Re: sensory consonance /dissonance' musical consonance / dissonance (Martin Braun )


Subject: Re: sensory consonance /dissonance' musical consonance / dissonance
From:    Martin Braun  <nombraun@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:14:05 +0200
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

Scott Spiegelberg wrote: > One observable > fact is that both Webern and Schoenberg are still taught today (both > their compositions and their theories and aesthetics) in music > schools around the world, thus their impact on music making is > decidedly not close to zero. Sorry, this conclusion does not follow from the observation at all. In some European countries grammar school students must take lessons in Latin for many years. Yet the application of this language by students in real life is evidently close to zero. Further, in some countries students were forced, due to political reasons, to take lessons in languages that were extremely unpopular. The results of these lessons were also often approaching zero. > Another observable fact is how many > composers state being influenced positively or negatively by the > Second Viennese School or by serialism in general (the number of > living composers who claim this is easily in the thousands). Where is this listing? Have these composers ever been counted? Has there ever been an empirical survey on this issue at all? Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Braun Neuroscience of Music S-671 95 Klässbol Sweden web site: http://w1.570.telia.com/~u57011259/index.htm


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2007/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University