pitch jnd's at low pitches (Roy Patterson )


Subject: pitch jnd's at low pitches
From:    Roy Patterson  <rdp1@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:08:54 +0000
List-Archive:<http://lists.mcgill.ca/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=AUDITORY>

Before getting too concerned about how accurately you can measure fo in the lower octaves, perhaps you would like to consider how accurately one can hear notes in the lowest octaves. The just-noticeable-difference for melodic pitch is rising rapidly in the 30 Hz region. So whatever pitch you are hearing, you are hearing it much less accurately at 30 Hz than at 60 Hz. As a rough guide at 16 Hz, the jnd is over 6% (i.e., greater than a semi-tone) at 32 Hz, the jnd is about 3% (greater than a quarter tone) at 64 Hz, the jnd is under 1.5%. So, around 32 Hz, you might be 90% correct when asked if a note is B, C or C#, but you would not be 100% correct, and you would not be able to say whether the instrument was tuned accurately, if by that you mean to within 1%. And with the lowest organ notes, around 16 Hz, although you may hear a pitch, you would be embarrassingly bad at saying whether it was B, C or C#. We did some experiments on the lower limit of melodic pitch a few years ago, upon which I base these comments. Krumbholz, K., Patterson, R.D. and Pressnitzer, D. (2000). The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108 1170-1180. Pressnitzer, D., Patterson, R.D. and Krumbholz, K. (2001). The lower limit of melodic pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 2074-2084. I can provide pdf's if anyone needs them. Regards Roy P -- Roy and Karalyn Patterson 17 Woodlands Road Great Shelford, Cambridge, CB22 5LW Phone +44 1223 842310 (International format) email rdp1@xxxxxxxx karalyn.patterson@xxxxxxxx


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2007/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University