Re: reference needed (ASR) (Christine Rankovic )

Subject: Re: reference needed (ASR)
From:    Christine Rankovic  <rankovic@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:14:34 -0400

I can't think of a reason that the answer would be different for ASR.

Christine Rankovic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Toth Laszlo" <tothl@xxxxxxxx>
To: <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: reference needed (ASR)


> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Christine Rankovic wrote:
>
> > support this statement with data from poorly conducted speech
recognition
> > tests like, for example, those conducted with an inadequate number of
speech
> > items, or when mean scores comprise scores of too few listeners.
>
> Sorry if I was misleading, but the question was about automatic
> (machine) speech recognition. That's why I tried to warn you that it was
off-topic.
> I asked the question here because I know that some great ASR people are
> lurking here. I apologize to all those others who are interested only in
> human speech perception.
>
>                Laszlo Toth
>         Hungarian Academy of Sciences         *
>   Research Group on Artificial Intelligence   *   "Failure only begins
>      e-mail: tothl@xxxxxxxx            *    when you stop trying"
>      http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/~tothl        *
>