Subject: computational complexity of psychoacoustic models From: #ARIJIT BISWAS# <arijit17@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 22:45:42 +0800This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C62BF5.4DB3D340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi List: =20 I'm interested to know the computational complexity (number of additions = and multiplications) of psychoacoustic models used in audio coding.=20 Well, to be more specific, let's say if I'm targeting to build a "fast" = psychoacoustic model, which existing model and/or what kind of = computational complexity should I try to beat?=20 =20 Any help/suggestions/references in this direction will be highly = appreciated. =20 Best Regards, ~Arijit =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C62BF5.4DB3D340 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1">=0A= <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">=0A= <HTML>=0A= <HEAD>=0A= =0A= <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 6.5.7638.1">=0A= <TITLE>[d.cirotteau@xxxxxxxx: Ne w topics - Call for participation to = the S2S =B2 research roadmap.]</TITLE>=0A= </HEAD>=0A= <BODY>=0A= <DIV id=3DidOWAReplyText89412 dir=3Dltr>=0A= <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>=0A= <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN lang=3DEN-US =0A= style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-size: = 12.0pt">Hi =0A= List:<?xml:namespace prefix =3D o ns =3D = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =0A= /><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>=0A= <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN lang=3DEN-US =0A= style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-size: = 12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>=0A= <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN lang=3DEN-US =0A= style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-size: = 12.0pt">I’m =0A= interested to know the computational complexity (number of additions and =0A= multiplications) of psychoacoustic models used in audio coding. =0A= <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>=0A= <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN lang=3DEN-US =0A= style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-size: = 12.0pt">Well, =0A= to be more specific, let’s say if I’m targeting to build a = “fast” psychoacoustic =0A= model, which existing model and/or what kind of computational complexity = should =0A= I try to beat? <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>=0A= <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN lang=3DEN-US =0A= style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-size: = 12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>=0A= <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN lang=3DEN-US =0A= style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-size: = 12.0pt">Any =0A= help/suggestions/references in this direction will be highly =0A= appreciated.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>=0A= <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN lang=3DEN-US =0A= style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-size: = 12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>=0A= <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN lang=3DEN-US =0A= style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-size: = 12.0pt">Best =0A= Regards,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P><SPAN lang=3DEN-US =0A= style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-ansi-language: = EN-US; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: = EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; = mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'">~Arijit</SPAN></FONT></DIV>=0A= <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV></DIV>=0A= =0A= </BODY>=0A= </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C62BF5.4DB3D340--