Re: Question about In-Ear Microphones (Elena Grassi )


Subject: Re: Question about In-Ear Microphones
From:    Elena Grassi  <egrassi@xxxxxxxx>
Date:    Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:06:24 -0500

Dear Martin, I have been using the Knowles Electronic FG-3629 (omnidirectional microphone encased in a cylindrical case with a diameter of 2.57 mm and a height of 2.57 mm) for blocked-ear canal HRTFs. They sell for about $25 at newark.com The amazing thing is that, although this microphones are not rated for ultrasound frequency, their frequency response is quite good in that range too. I have used them to measure bats' HRTFs as well. Hope you find this info useful. Best regards, -elena ---- Original message ---- >Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:37:24 +0100 >From: Martin Ostermayer <oster-m@xxxxxxxx> >Subject: Question about In-Ear Microphones >To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxx > >Dear List, > >I need to purchase a pair of in-ear microphones for doing HRTF measurements. I found a couple of threads suggesting the Sennheiser KE 4 to be a suited mic to do the job but the threads were from 1995. So I was wondering if anybody knew of other (better? cheaper?) alternatives available nowadays. I also would be thankful for any hint where I can buy any of them. > >Thanks in advance for your help. > >Cheers, >Martin Ostermayer > > > >-------------------------------- >Martin Ostermayer >RA, School of Psychology >University of Reading >Reading, RG6 6AL, UK >-------------------------------- >______________________________________________________________ >Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS! >Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193 ---- Elena Grassi, Ph.D. Perceptual Interfaces and Reality Lab University of Maryland Room 3355 A. V. Williams Building College Park, MD 20742 Ph. 301-405-2876


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2006/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University