Re: AUDITORY Digest - 2 Nov 2004 to 3 Nov 2004 (#2004-229) ("J. Scott Merritt" )


Subject: Re: AUDITORY Digest - 2 Nov 2004 to 3 Nov 2004 (#2004-229)
From:    "J. Scott Merritt"  <merrij3(at)RPI.EDU>
Date:    Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:32:46 -0500

Chuck, Have you considered PD-Audio and Mic2496 from http://www.core-sound.com ? Regards, Scott. On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:55:07 -0500 "Watson, Charles S" <watson(at)INDIANA.EDU> wrote: > Friends, > > We are about to do a speech recording project in which > we have to work at remote locations. We acquired a new laptop with a > large hard drive for this purpose and will back it up with memory > sticks. But we didn't want to trust the (noisy) built-in audio card for > digitizing, and therefore bought an external unit made by M-audio > ("Mobile Pre") which appeared to have pretty good specs for our purposes. Now > they have sent us three of those units, each of which peak clipped at about 50% > of the rated maximum. Anyone know of a reliable outboard two-channel > digitizer/preamp for this purpose? We would rather not get into the multi-channel zillion > dollar units made for the music industry. > > Thanks for any suggestions, > > Chuck Watson > > Indiana University > > > > > > > >


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2004/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University