Subject: Re: prenatal auditory localization PS From: Erik Larsen <elarsen(at)MIT.EDU> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:42:54 -0400In fact, the wavelength, which equals propagation velocity over frequency, will be longer than in air (because of the greater speed of sound in water). Together with the small head size of the fetus this should lead to extremely small interaural level differences. These two effects also reduce interaural phase differences, or interaural time-of-arrival. So it would seems that horizontal localization cues are very very small for the fetus and from that point of view I would think it unlikely that even approximate sound localization is possible. If the fetus is somehow aware of sound location at all, sounds would probably appear as coming from (nearly) directly ahead, given that interaural differences are so small. This is assuming the fetus' brain is already wired for sound localization in air. Erik Bob Masta wrote: > Another factor to consider is that the prenatal environment is > amniotic fluid, not air. So presumably all the wavelengths > will be greatly shortened. I'm not sure how this will affect > shadowing issues, but it would certainly affect phase issues. > Also, since the external sound must go through a tissue > interface before it even gets to the fluid, I'd guess that the > result would be a loss of localization information just from > that... sort of like a big piston driving a small hydraulic > coupler. > > Just my initial off-the-cuff 2 cents' worth. With more thought > I might get up to 2 bits! > > Best regards, > > > > > Bob Masta > > audioATdaqartaDOTcom -- Erik Larsen voice: 617-573-4120 Eaton-Peabody Laboratory cell : 617-803-6433 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114 email: elarsen(at)mit.edu