Re: Autocorrelation (Christian Kaernbach )


Subject: Re: Autocorrelation
From:    Christian Kaernbach  <chris(at)PSYCHOLOGIE.UNI-LEIPZIG.DE>
Date:    Sat, 15 Jul 2000 02:14:15 +0200

Peter Cariani wrote: > Christian Kaernbach wrote: > > Peter Cariani wrote: Dear Peter, Please forgive me that I will not enter into this discussion in this detail. Whenever my daily e-mails takes me more than 10 minutes I am convinced something is going wrong. My only and major point was and is: K&D 1998 is important to modelers because it sets constraints (asymmetry of 1st- and 2nd-order regularities). Up to the modelers to show that there is no problem. And I am not interested in comments why this and that model fails to reproduce this asymmetry (neglecting tails of tunig curves or whysoever).... all this is pure speculation. I am interested in models that succeed to produce this effect. Kind regards, Christian


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2000/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University