Re: Wasn't v. Helmholtz right? (Minoru Tsuzaki )


Subject: Re: Wasn't v. Helmholtz right?
From:    Minoru Tsuzaki  <minoru.tsuzaki(at)SLT.ATR.CO.JP>
Date:    Wed, 24 May 2000 19:21:57 +0900

Dear Eckard Blumschein From: Eckard Blumschein <Eckard.Blumschein(at)E-TECHNIK.UNI-MAGDEBURG.DE> Subject: Re: Wasn't v. Helmholtz right? Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 10:27:24 +0200 Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20000524102724.009a09c0(at)dfnserv1.urz.uni-magdeburg.de> > base and travels in the usual fashion toward the apex." Because, there is > no obvious reason why the sound pressure due to bony conduction might be > different in scala vestibuli and scala tympani, excitation must be mediated > via vibration of the whole bony structure. I think you are assuming that stapes and cochlea are vibrated as a whole rigid body by bone conduction. Can we assume that? ============================================================= Minoru Tsuzaki (minoru.tsuzaki(at)slt.atr.co.jp) ATR Spoken Language Translation Research Laboratories 2-2, Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Soraku-gun Kyoto 619-0288, Japan Tel: +81-774-95-1342 Fax: +81-774-95-1308 =============================================================


This message came from the mail archive
http://www.auditory.org/postings/2000/
maintained by:
DAn Ellis <dpwe@ee.columbia.edu>
Electrical Engineering Dept., Columbia University