Relative strength of vowel formants (Rene Quesnel )

Subject: Relative strength of vowel formants
From:    Rene Quesnel  <quesnel(at)SOUND.MUSIC.MCGILL.CA>
Date:    Mon, 21 Feb 1994 10:34:56 EST

Hello,

Can anyone tell me where I could find information about the relative
strength of formants in standard english and/or french vowels?

Thank you,
Rene Quesnel
Faculty of Music, McGill University
quesnel(at)music.mcgill.ca

Frm owner-auditory(at)VM1.MCGILL.CA  Tue Feb 22 15:44:01 1994
Received: from VM1.MCGILL.CA by VM1.MCGILL.CA (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 5174; Tue, 22 Feb 94 15:44:01 EST
Received: from VM1.MCGILL.CA by VM1.MCGILL.CA (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP
 id 8322; Tue, 22 Feb 94 15:43:59 EST
Date:         Tue, 22 Feb 1994 15:43:56 -0500
Reply-To:     Stephen Travis Pope <stp(at)CNMAT.CNMAT.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender:       Research in auditory perception <AUDITORY(at)VM1.MCGILL.CA>
From:         Stephen Travis Pope <stp(at)CNMAT.CNMAT.BERKELEY.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Information (on NeXT Audio HW)
X-To:         alain(at)linguist.jussieu.fr
X-cc:         bregman(at)ccrma.stanford.edu, AUDITORY(at)vm1.mcgill.ca,
              everyone(at)ccrma.stanford.edu
To:           Multiple recipients of list AUDITORY <AUDITORY(at)VM1.MCGILL.CA>
In-Reply-To:  bregman(at)ccrma.Stanford.EDU's letter of: 94 Feb 20

Hello all,

In case nobody has responded to this yet, there was an in-depth (seven-page)
user's report on the NeXT machine's audio I/O hardware and software in
"Computer Music Journal" 17:3 (Fall, 1993) pages 78-84.

stp

 `,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`
 `,`,`Stephen Travis Pope`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`
 `,`,`Computer Music Journal, CNMAT/U.C.Berkeley,`,`,`
 `,`,`stp(at)CNMAT.Berkeley.edu, (510) 644-3881,`,`,`,`,`
 `,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`
From owner-auditory(at)VM1.MCGILL.CA  Fri Feb 25 15:41:09 1994
Received: by media.mit.edu (5.57/DA1.0.4.amt)
	id AA09944; Fri, 25 Feb 94 15:41:09 -0500
Message-Id: <9402252041.AA09944(at)media.mit.edu>
Received: from VM1.MCGILL.CA by VM1.MCGILL.CA (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 8672; Fri, 25 Feb 94 15:39:14 EST
Received: from VM1.MCGILL.CA by VM1.MCGILL.CA (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP
 id 6693; Fri, 25 Feb 94 15:39:11 EST
Date:         Fri, 25 Feb 1994 15:38:13 -0500
Reply-To: Charles Tassoni <tass(at)CATTELL.PSYCH.UPENN.EDU>
Sender: Research in auditory perception <AUDITORY(at)VM1.MCGILL.CA>
From: Charles Tassoni <tass(at)CATTELL.PSYCH.UPENN.EDU>
Subject:      pitch tracking
X-To:         auditory(at)vm1.mcgill.ca
To: Multiple recipients of list AUDITORY <AUDITORY(at)VM1.MCGILL.CA>

        Can anybody tell me how good the latest generation of pitchtrackers
is?  Is there, for example, a pitchtracker that can take a melodic dictation
from a human singer?  That is, if I sing a melodic sequence and two musicians
produce the same transcription of that sequence, is there an algorithm that
can als output that same transcription?
        If accurate transcribers haven't been developed, what are some of the
problems that have prevented their development?