That's an excellent reference, thank you for reminding me! - I remember being surprised at the finding re: low frequencies
regards ppl Dr. Peter Lennox SFHEA Senior Lecturer in Perception College of Arts, Humanities and Education School of Arts
t: 01332 593155
https://derby.academia.edu/peterlennox https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Lennox
University of Derby, From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception <AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Bob Carlyon <Bob.Carlyon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 26 October 2017 10:44:28 To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Research Question Hi, You might be interested in the study by Halpern et al “Psychoacoustics of a chilling sound”, where they evaluated various unpleasant sounds and selected the worst (sharp object being dragged across slate). They
then manipulated the stimulus and, perhaps surprisingly, found the low-frequency content to be responsible for its nastiness. It’s worth reading, if only for the comment “To the authors and several other reluctant volunteer listeners, the digitized, filtered signal sounded very similar to, and just as unpleasant as the original”. So choose your participants wisely! I would recommend people close enough to be tolerant,
but not so close as to ruin a beautiful relationship. Bob PSYCHOACOUSTICS OF A CHILLING SOUND By:HALPERN,
DL (HALPERN, DL);
BLAKE, R (BLAKE, R);
HILLENBRAND, J (HILLENBRAND, J) PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS
Volume: 39
Issue: 2
Pages: 77-80
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:00 PM, James O'Sullivan <osullij8@xxxxxx> wrote:
The University of Derby has a published policy regarding email and reserves the right to monitor email traffic. If you believe this was sent to you in error, please reply to the sender and let them know. Key University contacts: http://www.derby.ac.uk/its/contacts/ |