[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Got the de Boer & Kuyper paper; question about correlated stimulus components



Theunissen and colleagues (http://www.jneurosci.org/content/20/6/2315.abstract) looked at the effect of stimulus correlation in reverse correlation. That work was based on a number of previous studies. There is also a review by Wu and colleagues  (http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113024) that covers the use of natural stimuli in reverse correlation.

 

Dan

 

From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception [mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberfeld-Twistel, Daniel
Sent: 23 October 2014 10:16
To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Got the de Boer & Kuyper paper; question about correlated stimulus components

 

Got it, thank you very much for you fast responses!

 

A related question: the classical reverse correlation technique usually uses the "white noise" idea and assumes that all stimulus components (e.g., acoustic energy in different spectral regions, or all the picture elements in

an image) are *uncorrelated*. In contrast, in studies on "psychophysical reverse correlation", we use multiple regression analyses which are not affected by correlated cues/stimulus components (e.g., http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050184).

 

Is anyone aware of a technique for the "classical" reverse correlation as in the de Boer paper that can be used with correlated stimulus components?

 

Best

 

Daniel

 

 

PD Dr. Daniel Oberfeld-Twistel

Johannes Gutenberg - Universitaet Mainz

Department of Psychology

Experimental Psychology

Wallstrasse 3

55122 Mainz

Germany

 

Phone ++49 (0) 6131 39 39274

Fax   ++49 (0) 6131 39 39268

http://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/oberfeld/

https://www.facebook.com/WahrnehmungUndPsychophysikUniMainz

 

From: AUDITORY - Research in Auditory Perception [mailto:AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Karl Lerud
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:25 AM
To: AUDITORY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Paper request: de Boer, E., & Kuyper, P. (1968). Triggered correlation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BM15(3), 169-179.

 

Here it is. Looks interesting; should give it a read myself.


Karl


On 10/23/2014 04:04 AM, Oberfeld-Twistel, Daniel wrote:

Dear list,

 

does anyone happen to have access to this classical paper on reverse correlation and could send me a PDF….?

 

de Boer, E., & Kuyper, P. (1968). Triggered correlation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BM15(3), 169-179.

 

Best

 

Daniel

 

PD Dr. Daniel Oberfeld-Twistel

Johannes Gutenberg - Universitaet Mainz

Department of Psychology

Experimental Psychology

Wallstrasse 3

55122 Mainz

Germany

 

Phone ++49 (0) 6131 39 39274

Fax   ++49 (0) 6131 39 39268

http://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/oberfeld/

https://www.facebook.com/WahrnehmungUndPsychophysikUniMainz

 


This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.